 | | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) Too bad... for 100USD (100EUR here in the old world) it should have a motor... with no motor this set gets too pricey. And I also think that the main image, picturing a motor, is misleading. I'm a bit disappointed. G. (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
"Gianluca Morelli" <poldoshop@yahoo.it> wrote in message news:JDoyM7.EJH@lugnet.com... (...) The motor is not included in the box. Look closely at this image: (URL) the lower right hand corner there is a picture of a 9v train motor and some track. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
What about the motor? The swiss crocodile looks motorized, but there's no motor in the parts list... (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Working Theme Park Ride: Enterprise
|
|
(URL) The "Enterprise" is a ride seen in many theme parks. It consists of a wheel with passenger cars along its edge. During the ride, the wheel spins and is raised up to the vertical. It has seating for 24 mini-figs and is painted as "The (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
"Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:JDowF1.G1y@lugnet.com... (...) I will go ahead and pre-answer one question which I am pretty sure someone will pose: Q: Why are their two versions of the box? A: Like many LEGO sets, (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
ILTCO has received some images of the new 10183 LEGO Hobby Train. (URL) you are not familiar with the LEGO Hobby Train (aka UTB), you can read some background information in this thread: (URL) first public announcement of the 10183 LEGO Hobby Train (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) Or maybe just wrap the calls inside a mutex, so at least the behaviour is defined, if not optimum. Many of the NBC/NXC macros do exactly that, maybe all of them should? ROSCO (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) I understand his confusion. Not allowing separate threads to call the same subroutine is certainly unexpected. The concept of "thread" conventionally involves separate stacks for local variables (and a shared global state -- unlike separate (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) It is possible. The NXC API doesn't currently wrap this capability in a really simple function. (...) The RotateMotor API function calls a subroutine written in NBC that does not return until the tachometer limit target has been reached. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth NXT cable segment
|
|
(...) The simplest answer is to stretch a cylinder to approximate the shape of the NXT cable. Kevin (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
