 | | Re: Rocket Sled Team
|
|
These rocket sleds are a fun little build, and what a team. Beyond that, I'd like to thank you for almost single-handedly replenishing the oxygen tanks of .space. That you have brought such humour, classic style and quality photography with you is a (...) (19 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 13 New BrickArms Weapons Available NOW!
|
|
Oh man, Will, I am going to be so broke at Brickfest...you will have all of my money! Why did you have to do this! I couldn't stop buying your guns at NWBrickCon, so now you go and do this to me. :-) Seriously, I can't wait to get my hands on these. (...) (19 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.parts.custom)
|
| |
| | Advice on NXT demonstration Project
|
|
Hi people, I was asked to perform a Mindstorm Demonstration for a company especialized in High Level Businnes Trainning (Coaching, Leadership, Creativity, Future, etc...) They heard about lego robotics and they want to know more about it, and (...) (19 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: attention!: PAUL SINASOHN ----jambalaya box
|
|
(...) Yikes! WHat email address did you send the message to? The box is packed and is going out in tomorrow's mail. Paul (19 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: Perth Lego Gathering
|
|
(...) Hi Braith will be there can you e-mail me your adress and do you need anything bought over apart from lego? Michael Dickinson. (19 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.loc.au.wa.per)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for LEGO instruction CDs we can sell in our store.
|
|
(...) Something you're not telling us? ;-) "Not that there's anything wrong with that..." (19 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.build, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) When I made the suggestion I was picturing a really long version of the 6394 Metro Park & Service Tower "elevator" mechanism. I guess it would work better to use technic racks with a worm gear driven elevator. That could even be motorized. My (...) (19 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) On the other hand "Space Ship One" already surpassed NASA in efficiency with the use of a "carrier plane" to get a much higher start. Building a plane specifically designed for high altitude super sonic launching of "rocket ships" is one easy (...) (19 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) snipped (...) Indeed! New Mexico has approved land for Virgin Galatic to build the first international spaceport. Virgin Galatic is even taking applications for employees. (URL) Commercial enterprise will drive down costs and increase (...) (19 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) I did some preliminary studies for building a space elevator. I think with some very significant selective compression of the diameter (and length) of the cable, the anchor station and the cable cars could be done. I was considering the LoM (...) (19 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
