 | | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) Actually, exactly the point I was trying to make (you just made it shorter). If there's an economic or resource-driven reason for doing something, commercial interests do a great job. But if you want to go somewhere, trying to invent (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
I love the classic Space look. I wish I had those yellow windshield pieces. (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) don, you wouldn't have a model file at all without the parts library. at least not without extreme effort because of the missing visual feedback. I'll give you some codes: CM051P09.dat, HF300P09.dat, CM060P14.dat, CM053P03.dat, CM250P02.dat (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Straight LEGO Country Flags of 70's and 80's
|
|
(...) Hello Gerhard, Which one of the (URL) two sets with number 1589> are you refering to? :-) I guess your question concerns the set with LUGNET reference number (URL) 1589_1>, Town Square. It is just as the information in the LUGNET database says (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New inline 4 cylinder Pneumatic Engine - No valves.
|
|
(...) Very interested. I'm always on the lookout for new cam designs. The engine's very cool, although I can't quite visualize the motion. Thanks! Rick C. (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) If you are referring to the non-pursuit section of the readme it is most definitely in accord with the license. As you say a license is only as good as its enforcement but stating a policy of enforcement does not change the license. As an (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
|
(...) Hahaha :) The advantages of using the monorail track are that it's very, very rigid laterally (like, it can really press into it without it deflecting at all) and simple to construct. It's a wide, flat surface... the 4.5 V rails I fear will (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) I agree. The way the readme puts it is not in accord with what the license requires. Furthermore, because there is a disclaimer in readme that it is not a license, that whole bit can and should be ignored and only the license followed. If (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
|
|
(...) I'm not sure I agree with the ethical imperative argument. There are plenty of old laws on statute books that no-one follows or expects to follow but are still there. Either way, ethical decisions are made on an individual basis (including the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: automazione treni
|
|
(...) Il regolamento mi sembra ben articolato, anche se non troppo restrittivo (tranne che x le dimensioni e peso)..cioé dire che uno puo' mettere piu' brick programmabili é un chiaro vantaggio a chi ha piu' pezzi..io ad esempio ne ho due oltre a (...) (19 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
