 | | Re: another comparison
|
|
(...) Perhaps a good benchmark would be to write a PID controller and measure the number of control loop iterations per second that can be achieved under each environment. This incorporates sensor input with motor output, and uses a moderate amount (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: This is the cancer that is killing Lugnet (Was Re: Apology)
|
|
(...) Umm... the only person arguing here is you: the original posters had a problem with each other, that they resolved; argument ended. Period. If the two principles have moved beyond this, well... (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Diorama non ufficiale per Ballabio
|
|
(...) E perché? Per me invece si può mettere di tutto e di più e mescolare assieme. I modelli vintage avranno semplicemente il ruolo di auto "non catalizzate" :-) Almeno a me piaceva così, e scommetto che ancora piace ai bambini. Dopotutto le città (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: New Electrical Connectors ( LEGO --> Please, please read )
|
|
(...) ... (...) I second the idea of conversion connectors... Alex Farlie (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | RE: Another Challenge. Performance Comparison
|
|
(...) Here's my distilled summary of relative execution speeds of various Mindstorms products / environments. All data is normalized to the fastest performance. Relative Platform Product Speed 1X NXT RobotC 2X NXT Robolab 15X NXT NXT-G 5-10X RCX (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Two moonbase modules from Brickfest 2006
|
|
Thanks for sharing these with those of us who couldn't make it to BF2006. These are a couple of the most impressive moon bases modules I've seen! When I saw the name Earth Memory Moonbase, I thought, "Oh my! Is this a world in which the Earth has (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: another comparison
|
|
(...) I'd love to make some other comparisions; actually, some of us have been trying to figure out a good way to do this. Part of the problem is defineing specific "goals" for a battery of tests. A DFT (while impressive), is propably not the best (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Hi everyone
|
|
(...) Thanks Braith, I'd be happy to join in the AFOL gathering whenever your ready to have it. Maybe on a Sunday in late February? Hopefully a few poeple can come. Aaron (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | RE: What do these macros do? [IOMAP Access Execution Times
|
|
(...) You're right. IOMapRead and IOMapWrite are very slow functions. They're slow because you pass a character string for the name of the module you want to access; the NXT-G firmware runs through the list of modules looking for a match on the (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: This is the cancer that is killing Lugnet (Was Re: Apology)
|
|
(...) ...//snip... ...snip// (...) In fact, the whole Internet is a wasteland !! Anybody can do anything there!! For me LUGNET/robotics is an excellent forum. I participate for several years now and I must appreciate the contributions of many (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
