 | | Reverse engineering (Was: Why TLG doesn't have a leg to stand on anymore.)
|
|
(...) You have (as I read the law) been allowed to do that in EU for a few years now. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Sith Infiltrator now $15.99 at ShopKo
|
|
Any chance someone can pick me up a couple of these and ship them to me both crammed in one box? I only want the parts. Or does anyone know if they take CCs over the phone, and can ship out? If so, I need the number of a good store to call ;-) (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) The message was posted by me. my newsreader seemed to stuff it up and post to .geek as well as mailing it to tore so the message was posted by me but it should never have been so therefore it should not have been seen by people on this group. (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 6419 Paradisa Question
|
|
Since they are no longer offered by TLG, you will pay a premium for Paradisa (a lot of closet pink fans out there;) Maybe introduce your daughter to Belville, or Scala. Watch out, however, because if your daughter is like mine, she'll take a fancy (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Retirement. for a while
|
|
im going to "chill" for a while. no models or parts for a bit. when my drive crashed i lost everything. its going to be a while... (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 4561 Railway Express newbie review
|
|
I built the 4561 train over the weekend and offer the following observations. I am a newbie to trains so please know that my comments are relative. 1.) The supply of windows is great. 2.) The amount of track-- relative to the length of the train-- (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Ahh, cool, and here it is... (URL) THE review format. :) (...) If you posted it to RTL, then the place I'd would expect it to have shown up would be on Joshua's site, at the rec.toys.lego LEGO Set Review Archive: (URL) you posted it using THE (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Pause Links
|
|
(...) positively link to that. (...) GOOD LINK: (URL) (web page) BAD LINK: (URL) (image) (...) lugnet.publish is probably the best place. --Todd [followups to lugnet.admin.general] (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) According to the NNTP headers in the message, it was posted by you to lugnet.off-topic.geek on Tuesday, August 3, 1999 at 11:16:38 GMT, from studun26.murdoch.edu.au, using Netscape 4.03 for Win95. Still baffled? (...) Apparently you posted it (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Give me strength...
|
|
Thanks Mark, that was the set, To bad he doesn't have the parts for it anymore :( I just needed to be sure I wasn't losing my mind and thinking of a set that wasn't real! Thanks again! (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
