 | | Google and rtlToronto
|
|
I just notices that if you (URL) google for rtlToronto> my site/blog is the 5th hit. Weird, eh? -Rob A> (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Library and the possible strike...
|
|
I know Prokect Y it is still a number of days away but... I was talking to a friend who thought that the TPL was staffed by CUPE. Do we need to consider an alternate venue in case they are (still) on strike (in which case the library would close)? (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) I would agree with that scoring. And I want to see your rover climb out of a (min) 5" high shell :) So go for it! I do wonder about the definition of "in" though. If you have a stationary outer shell shaped like an open 'U' with three openings (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | So its (MDP) over?
|
|
So is that it? All 100 are accounted for? (crosses fingers many potential participants were on vacation) -aps (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: turtle coding kit (Re: How would we (the rest of us) communicate ideas to the MDP?)
|
|
(...) I am entirely ignorant of helping kids, and have no idea if this is practical or reasonable (it probably isn't), but I'll mention my odd demo thought anyway... An exercise in understanding robots could be to pick a corridor with a corner in (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) This is a pure hypothetical--I'm not saying I'm doing this or not... If there's this outside shell that has 6-8 transfer openings and there's this robot inside that comes out when we press (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) cough... Hassenplug.... cough. Antonishen cough... :) Chris (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: New Images of 2006 Trains
|
|
(...) This was bugging me as well, so I tried a few things in TrackDraw and came up with this: (URL) 8 straights, 20 curves, one left and one right point. It *nearly* works. There is about a stud overlap on the top right corner. I doubt that this is (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | EB Destroyer December
|
|
(URL) EB Destroyer December> The December is the result of over one year of development by deep space division of the Eastern Block Cosmos Directorate. It is the first ship in the Eastern Block arsenal designed specifically to combat the 3vil threat (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.space, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Hogwarts Express train - collaboration with James Mathis
|
|
Hi Mark, (...) I don't but CAD does. I figure those parts are appearing everywhere now so it's only a matter of time before Brickilink reflects their true value. (...) Carriages look good although I don't like the gears too much. Have you thought (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hogwarts Express train - collaboration with James Mathis
|
|
(...) Is that just super-affluence of red curved slopes or was the carriage affected by a passing dementor? :-) Anyway, to compare notes, here's a link to my 8mm scale Hogwarts Express, a scale model of the Hall class engine (5972 Olton Hall) used (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) I think that by leaving this option open many will build one part that goes around and dispense the blocks and the second part which can just stand in one spot and have many transfer openings. If everyone agrees to it then I'm fine with it (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase Module: Twin Mech Bay 10 - ZRX1 Armour Application Facility
|
|
I dunno man - the idea is fun, but the execution is really lackluster. I think there's a lot of potential in the concept of mechbays that you haven't tapped with this giant-box-around-the-robot thing, and that's kind of sad, because I could see this (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: New Images of 2006 Trains
|
|
(...) Okay, that's funny! Sorta like life imitating art imitating life. JOHN (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: turtle coding kit (Re: How would we (the rest of us) communicate ideas to the MDP?)
|
|
(...) This sounds like a good demo that someone within the MDP program can create (hint, hint, wink wink, nudge, nudge). Show the difference between navigating through a maze using (1) the 'dead reconing' method, (2) the ultrasound sensor and the (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Replacement Wire
|
|
(...) The motor... easily, the loco/rolling stock however... :) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New Images of 2006 Trains
|
|
(...) The pics I got at Toy Fair were of preprod stuff (witness the use of a metal railed turnout in old gray), so don't really help. The spoked wheels are there but the motor block on that one appears not to have technic axles: (URL) (and others in (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Finds at Orlando PaB
|
|
"Brian Davis" <brdavis@iusb.edu> wrote in message news:Iv3u6K.vu0@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I think is where the disconnect for me is. I find the "cup" aspect of P-a-B annoying. I have purchased quite a few (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.loc.us.fl.orl, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) Well, I want to hear what others (eg Derek, RobA, Iain, Vitali) have to say, as they are more important than my opinion...but... I would take the block count inbound of the two as the greater of the two. So if Part A gets 5 unique blocks and (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickJournal 3 is REALLY out!
|
|
(...) Great work Joe! I finally finished reading it yesterday and can't wait for #4! The writing and in particular the graphic design are excellent. It's truly a professional quality magazine that anyone in the hobby would be proud of. I'm sure if (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)
|
