 | | Re: Arched Through Truss Bridge - LegoWorld 2005 Bridge strength contest
|
|
(...) WOW! That's very impressive. (yeh, I know- I'm a little late in posting this. :-) It has a nice shape and looks very stout. The relatively large height (compared to the span length) gives it a lot of strength. I like how you doubled some of (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Sticker sides
|
|
Hello, At the first bullet of the LDraw Official Library Standard for Sticker Parts (URL) is written: (...) Some new stickers submitted to the parts tracker have the colors at the edges of the front continuing on the sides. Is the article outdated (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Diorama 2006 (con le strade di bricks!) + aggiornamenti vari :-)
|
|
(...) Fatto! Grazie!!! Luca (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Searching for some part for LDraw
|
|
Has anybody modelled the following parts? Technic Throwbot Visor' (x209) (URL) Arm Forked with Flexible Center and Ball Joint' (32168) (URL) Gear Box Half with 4 Axle Stubs and 6 Pin Sockets' (32167) (URL) Throwbot Disc with 2 Pips and Radial Arrows (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT release date.
|
|
(...) Yeah, I can understand though I still contend 100 is too small darn it! But your point is well understood (especially by me who has dealt with countless examples of this scenario). (...) Its fantastic no doubt! Very rarely do you find such a (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT release date.
|
|
(...) I suspect that the logistics is a big issue. I am a debugger for a living, and know how to report the information that is critical to a bug. As a developer (of LPub and LSynth for example). Most of the bugs reported to me are extremely vague (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What to do if not selected for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) I agree. Simply put, more types of parts to work with increases the realm of possibility. Kev (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Java for Robots (was NXT and bluetooth enabled phones)
|
|
Bruce (...) Ermm. How much does a NXT have? No doubt you think that everyone should buy one of your systems but far more NXTs will be sold. Lookng at the posts on other robotics newsgroups, I reckon that over 90% of home-made robots do not have (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java (or other langs) for Robots
|
|
Dan (...) (at (...) Wow, that's nice to hear. Brooke's philosopy deals very neatly with levels 1 and 2 but how do CMU say we should integrate the high-level stuff into it? That has always been my difficulty with subsumption architecture. It's fine (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT release date.
|
|
(...) Even though I do wish all of the above conjecture was true, I think it might be just a slip on the LEGO SHOP website. I agree that the August date was probably chosen to be inline with the next school year and that there is a strong (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
