Subject:
|
Re: NXT release date.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:27:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2009 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > The downside is logistics and managing a large bunch of Beta testers. There
> > would need to be a central place for all participants of the program can
> > contribute and communicate with one another as well as any legal constraints
> > the program encompasses and needs to enforce (obviously, larger program
> > participants, harder to enforce).
>
> I suspect that logistics is a big issue. I am a debugger for a living, and
> know how to report the information that is critical to a bug.
>
> As a developer (of LPub and LSynth for example). Most of the bugs reported to
> me are extremely vague "I tried this and it didn't work. Any ideas?"
>
> This is pretty tough to work with. Maybe they are trying not to set themselves
> up for input overload.
Yeah, I can understand though I still contend 100 is too small darn it! But
your point is well understood (especially by me who has dealt with countless
examples of this scenario).
> I just think it is fabulous that LEGO is providing the Mindstorms Development
> Program. Never seen such a thing done so publicly.
Its fantastic no doubt! Very rarely do you find such a positive synergistic
relantionship between the company and the public community in the market.
-aps
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NXT release date.
|
| (...) I suspect that the logistics is a big issue. I am a debugger for a living, and know how to report the information that is critical to a bug. As a developer (of LPub and LSynth for example). Most of the bugs reported to me are extremely vague (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
