 | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) Thanks Larry, I wanted to understand method by which my email address was harvested before address it to MOCPages. Clearly it's a design flaw, and not something more sinister which was one of my original concerns. Derek (20 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 2006...eccoli!
|
|
(...) "juniorizzati" non è la parola giusta... questi sono proprio pezzi di un giocattolo da bancarella cinese :-( (...) Già, hanno fatto quei pezzi strafighi e poi sotto mettono questa schifezza che anche un bambino farebbe meglio. Avete notato (...) (20 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - anyone own a robot vacum?
|
|
(...) I wouldn't take that statement too seriously -- it's a lawyer spouting turf-talk, not a product review. Steve (20 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) It would take a little more development effort to do a hash, but ya. Ouch. I agree. Ouch. Not only that but it seems to vary across time, some of my creations have older email addresses embedded, presumably matching when I changed my emails as (...) (20 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x1 curved slope available in dark bluish gray
|
|
(...) I found this just now. The pictures are good and clear. (URL) Jonathan (20 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
