|
|
 | | Re: Big Brother?
|
| (...) Allan, I have some bad news. The guys at MIT did a study on TIN FOIL helmets, if you are using one; you HAVE to stop. (URL) is a snippet of results: (posted without permission (1)) --snip--- We investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: latest results
|
| (...) Steve, did you use my "skip over" light array idea? you didnt... I can feel it. Chris. PS any interest in a 8417 (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | latest results
|
| Well, the "guys from Indiana" did pretty good at the Chibots event last weekend. In addition to setting up a somewhat small (by our standards) ball contraption with 13 modules, we made a good showing with our competition robots. We (Brian, Bryan and (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | Re: After Eight
|
| Hey Jojo, More great furnishings! (Though I do not know the commercial) After all the great stuff (URL) in this folder>, you'd better be planning an entry for the "Castle room interior" category in CCCIII. Bruce (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Turners Cross a segment of a Castle
|
| Hey Nathan, Amazing MOC! I've left extensive comments on Classic-Castle. Bruce (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Loco MOC
|
| (...) snip (...) Wow! Awesome work! later, James Mathis (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | Re: One New Train in Two Liveries-- Your opinion
|
| (...) Hi, Mat, A Coaster version will be nice. Thanks for the compliment on the design. I will be selling instructions. I'd like to sell the Rail Runner version of the instructions since I am acquiring the license for their livery. The acquisition (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Spybot built-in program
|
| (...) I spent some time recently working on NQC headers which would enable using more (if not all) of the Spybot ROM subroutines and tasks with a NQC program. I haven't done extensive testing of the headers in real programs. I hope there are still a (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) Isn't there an official order of preference for where a file comes from (eg. check MPD firsrt, directory second and parts directory third)? If so then the most sensible way of processing would be to go through that, which would ensure no (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| I agree and disagree with this. I agree that it would be good (for now) if L3P only substituted LGEO parts for files with a .dat extension. Or, even better, if (a) the file being substituted has the UNOFFICIAL/LDRAWORG meta-statement and states it (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
|
