 | | RE: RCX to RCX NQC
|
|
The message "toggle" bit was a good concept that has very limited value in practical use. I guess the intent was to prevent unexpected behavior when a PC program attempts retransmission after a message failure. Suppose the failure condition was that (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
 | | Re: Vogon Constructor Ship
|
|
(...) In case you missed it, Nathan also did a Heart of Gold, announced (URL) A> (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
 | | Re: Bonktron: BO-1
|
|
(...) Awesome! Let's do that! It'd be funny. e (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
 | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) In the Brickopedia I got away from those two terms, since I agree with you... they can be confusing at times. :) For example, I called this: (URL) an 'Outer Corner' as in the way it's sometimes used to create the outer corner or edge of a (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit
|
|
(...) I've come up with three AND gate technologies so far. Also I've come up with three OR gate designs too (those are differential output, plus I have a single pressure OR too). I've only come up with one differential XOR and a single pressure (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
 | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) I always had a problem with "convex" and "concave" (and, of course, their "doubled" bretheren). I've always associated those words with curved parts. But I can't really think of a better way to describe them.. Darrell (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
 | | What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) Part names. One of my favorite topics. :) While I was working on the (URL) for my book I spent a lot of time thinking about part naming and categorization. (...) I don't know that I'd label that name as "ridiculous". It may be outdated(1), but (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Teknomeka build
|
|
"I think I know how to get up to the cockpit!" "Great! How?" "On the remote lock key fob there's a green button that makes it automatically kneel down, lower a hand and lift the pilot up." "Cool. So let's try it!" "Aww man! I think I left the remote (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
 | | LDD Loading Problem
|
|
LDD is not working for me...it won't load! After starting the program, the start-up page comes on-screen and indicates that it is loading parts. It gets to 182 parts and freezes. Checking on system performance shows LDD to be non-responsive and (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
 | | Re: New Ship: Harlequin
|
|
(...) I imagined a Black-Bonktron ship would be somewhat larger. Nice tickler though ! pete.w (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.space, FTX) !!
|
| |
 | | I wonder if they'll work with Lego pneumatics
|
|
(URL) double acting soleniod valve looks "very" interesting! Anyone know any more about this? JB (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
 | | The Train Show *Upcoming LEGO episode!
|
|
I have not watched "Prototypical Trains & Operations - Operations Road Show NMRA Cincinnati, OH yet but it is from the NMRA show. My Tivo recorded it today, it will be on Direct TV (379 RFD Rural Free Delivery) 9/15 12:30 am, 9/15 6:30 am, 9/19 (...) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: The MATING GAME - rtl 20
|
|
(...) And then we can all make space ships that look like dinkys! Tee hee hee! -Greg (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
 | | Re: Bonktron: BO-1
|
|
(...) Some might argue that they collectively equal a sense of humour. Tim (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
 | | Re: Bonktron: BO-1
|
|
(...) All things to be proud of I'm sure. e (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
 | | Re: RCX to RCX NQC
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure, both the remote, and the send message commands only have one op-code, and are done differently from the rest. Steve (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
 | | Re: Teknomeka build
|
|
this is pretty cool Chris. Thanks for the write up. How long did it take you in actual build time? (once you had the neccessary parts) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
 | | Re: Buzz! Sting 'em!
|
|
(...) Looks good! Always makes me happy to see mosaics make with my program! bob (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.mosaic, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Vogon Constructor Ship
|
|
In lugnet.announce.moc, Nathan Proudlove announced: (...) Well, it's not quite the shape depicted in the 1980 BBC TV mini-series, and it's definitely not a grey block from this spring's movie (now on DVD!); and although it's not all that interesting (...) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: RCX to RCX NQC
|
|
(...) Ahh, now I understand why it is called a "toggle bit" - I somehow misinterpreted this to mean a new command had the toggle bit set (to 1), and if the sending unit doesn't recieve a reply it should re-transmit the command with the toggle bit (...) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|