 | | Re: Joe Vig Meets a Lady (A Little Risque)
|
|
Nathan, cap yourself. I love it. It's a prime example of the sort of truly warped mindset Lugnet is all too short on. Good choice of faces and a good presentation - it goes from merely sleazy to disturbing very nicely :D. Soren (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.build.vignette, lugnet.town) !
|
| |
| | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
(...) Well, the term was not my idea, several people in this very newsgroup invented this more or less simultaneously, and, as the new gauge is designed to be chaeper than the other gauge, they are not totally wrong, are they? (...) That would be (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
(...) Depends. Infrared is very tricky for mobile systems, and a train out of sight (behind houses, in a hunnel) is dead meat in tems of infrared communication... A simple (still reliable!) Bluetooth system should be in the same price range as a (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO RoboCam'Bot
|
|
I'm getting a Client is Offline message from deerfield.com Someone forget to pay their internet bill? :-) Derek (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: New Slave I & minifigs
|
|
(...) I always thought (URL) Shaq> made for a good female head. Marc Nelson Jr. (URL) Marc's Creations>> (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Legway
|
|
(...) I love to hear about these. I know building someone else's design, and using someone else's code doesn't sound like a challenge, but I also know setting up BrickOS IS a challenge. And besides, it's pretty cool to watch it stand there... Steve (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
(...) Well - I am not thrilled with your references to the train as "el cheapo". Lego is a company that has to make money (the whole point of a company). They are making new trains in a direction that will make the train more affordable to a larger (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
(...) That might be a little expensive to put in a system that's supposed to reduce the entry price! Still, an auxiliary output on the remote control train motor (for lights, horn or extra motor-driven uncoupler) would be a great gift to train (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
Hi, all, I know this might just be a shot in the blue sky, but anyway: Lego is most propably working on a new RCX system. At the Legofan site, there is a discussion about things that should be in a new RCX, and someone mentioned Bluetooth as a (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
|
(...) Only one problem...if you link the switches with an axel, they will be oriented such that they are always both on or both off. The on and off positions are 45 degrees out of phase, not 90... The concept is good (at least I think it will work (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
|
(...) We can use two polarity reversors to create a three way switch. Set two polarity reversors side by side, linked by an axle. Set it up so that when one reversor is on (no matter the polarity), the other is off. If we drive 9V into both (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Error in part #590
|
|
"Banban" <banban@banban.org> wrote in news:ILnt2z.1G5t@lugnet.com: (...) You could import any unofficial files into the .mpd-files itself. That way anyone with just the official library installed, can open your file. Even if they have another (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Slave I & minifigs
|
|
(...) ... who has a brown minifig head.... ... who has a brown minifig head with the GENERIC minifig face ... Ladies and gentlemen, we now have the means to make darkskinned LEGO women. Huzzah!!! --- Philip (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Holden Monaro (with bogan)
|
|
(...) Hey Tim! I just notice this old holden had gone to number one on the LUGNET spotlight list!! Great effort for a MOC of an Aussie subject. Cheers Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Error in part #590
|
|
(...) The parts update process is stalled for the present, whilst the LDraw Steering Committee resolve some remaining issues with the Contributor Agreement. In particular, how to deal with contributions from prolific authors who have not affirmed (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: cerco set studios 1349
|
|
Ciao, Matteo ! Se passo da Ivrea vado a vedere, magari ti telefono mentre sono sul posto. Se ne frattempo risolvi......fammelo sapere. Giuliano (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug.market)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is this?
|
|
(...) dandy station. for the life of me I can not find the link where he anounces himself Still damn impressive. (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Error in part #590
|
|
(...) I'm sorry for this useless post, but I'm not very familiar with the LDraw certifying process (so I didn't check if the part was in PT). But I read the FAQ to learn more about this process. And I guess this part won't be released before a (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
|
(...) Yes, I must have. I thought the point was that Damien wants a scripting language to do animation. And I keep trying to say POV-Ray is it. Or something comercial. Don't try to reinvent the wheel like I did with Lani. Learn the current (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
|
(...) There are 2 ways you can approach this. Animation involves time. The LDraw format does not include anything in it to deal with time. The first approach would be to add something to deal with time to the LDraw format. This is a very bad idea (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
