 | | Re: Old railway station
|
|
(...) Thanks, that's a picture I have not seen before. It is a different version with a shorter bridge and only 2 platforms. But the platforms are longer and there's a roof above the platform. Can you get a higher quality picture of it? Niels (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Increasing POV resolution from L3PAO
|
|
I'm in a Lego CAD class at the moment. One of my students built a large army of Samurai Minifigs about 20 across and 8 deep. He rendered it via POV to a 640x480 (as defined in L3PAO). We tried to increase resolution with a render size up to 4 times (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Revival Survey
|
|
Hello! Most likely I'll just repeat what others have said before. Howeveer, I didn't read any answer to this thread before I filled in this survey. (...) Because they offer th best possibility to build my own little world. They offer both (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 75ton breakdown crane
|
|
(...) That looks nice, the shape and proportions are very good and I like the way you have arranged the wheelsets. I can't help feeling tho' that it need some detailing, greebling if you are a spacer. Tim (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Most Complex Lego Set Numbers Ever...
|
|
I am still working on mapping out the many variations of old Lego set and idea book numbers (for the Lego CD) from the 1950's and 1960's, and there are 3 Lego item numbers that stand out as having ENORMOUS quantities of variations. They are: 1) (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 1077 - Blue Tow Hitch
|
|
(...) (URL) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 8420 technic Bike... new shock part....flaw or new feature?
|
|
Hello John, (...) The 8369 has two of these shocks. One as you noticed for the front axle and the second one for the rear axle. I do drive with this RC car outside and when driving on sand you want a lot of ground clearance. I have build myself a 4 (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 3.0 RC 1 Released ***
|
|
(...) Thanks for that piece of info. It could make tracking down the source of the problem easier. --Travis Cobbs (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 3.0 RC 1 Released ***
|
|
(...) Thanks for the report. I actually kind of see it as good news. It validates my use of a public release candidate instead of just going ahead and releasing the official 3.0. There's just so much going on inside the program, that bugs like these (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 3.0 RC 1 Released ***
|
|
(...) It appears to be a new bug as it wasn't a problem in Beta 1. (21 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
