 | | Re: The all-new LUGNET .Underground
|
|
(...) Har har Tim (Mind you, you lose the pun when you change group to o-t.pun!) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Is this actually true? I think you need to compare to LGB, Lionel, or quality HO or N gear rather than comparing to Bachman or Tyco stuff (or the equivalent low quality Oz brands). In that case LEGO stuff is cheaper. At least the starter sets (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: push trains (was Re: 12V to 9V - why the switch)
|
|
(...) Yes exactly like 7715, which was the only set I could afford as a kid, but with the advantage that you wouldn't need to buy electrical rails to electrify it tim (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | push trains (was Re: 12V to 9V - why the switch)
|
|
(...) I think that producing a line of unpowered trains would be a GREAT move for TLC. Basicly, sell train sets that are pretty much the same as they are now but without the motor/speed regulator/etc. Include a circle or oval of track plus a (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Riley wrote: <snip> (...) They are in the new greys--I bought the Harry Potter motorized Hogwarts package--the track that come in the Hogwarts box are the new dark grey. The funny thing is I bought the 'big package' from (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) The big question is, why arent LEGO trains available on the retail shelves? I suspect part of it is because LEGO trains as a rule are expensive. Expensive compared to other LEGO sets (due to the cost of the electrics) And more to the point, (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
(...) Yeah, I can never remember how to attach gdb to a running process, so that one isn't in my usual bag of tricks. I'll have to try harder to remember it next time. Fortunately for me, Kevin already found the bug in lpub. :^) Don (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
(...) Australia is definitely not the unique case, but more likely the typical case. In the US, most consumers can only buy Lego trains online or from S@H. During the holiday shopping season, TRU may carry trains, but other than that, trains are (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
|
I've snipped all the rest away because I agree with it, close enough, and I want to focus on one thing... (...) THe following is my view but I believe it's pretty widely shared. LUGNET is (especially when it's working right) a meritocracy. You get (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.3.0.6 available (ldGLite working and looks Marvelous)
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote: I just timed rendering of all the pedmatic construction step images and part list images and the process took less than 3 minutes! Amazing. After I debug ldglite and ldview on windows 98, then I'll work on the (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
