|
|
 | | Re: What if.....
|
| (...) I think this is certainly an interesting idea, but I don't follow this specific point. I think that although the current bases have their limits, they're easy enough to work around as far as lengths go. I think a good articulation is more (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | 2 new GBC modules...
|
| (2 URLs) ...and a "small ball contraption" ;o) (URL) See them (URL) here> (photos, movies) Enjoy! Philo (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: Train part suggestion
|
| (...) Well Brickshelf is currently down so I can't check, but from memory it was this part (URL) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | What if.....
|
| Hello all I have this idea for a what if part. Its a 6x12 train base plate. I think it would have some advantages over the standard 6x24 and 6x28 base plates. First off, it would alow people to make longer trains by not limiting you to the current (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: RIS 2.0 Problems - Language war in 32k RAM
|
| This thread made my day. Really! In the end, the brick is an embedded system with a whopping 32k of RAM, mostly filled up by the operating system. For me (ok, I admit, I want to drive the war a bit further...) even c++ has too much overhead to be (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Skipped 3 messages in
group
lugnet.admin.general (Skip-filter settings)
|
