To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *489881 (-20)
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Calum, Your my new favorite poster!!! Fire up that grill and flame away! Maybe we can burn this color thing to ashes. Great post I just wish I could write something half that good. Eric Kingsley (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Holiday houses
 
OK, Problem solved. I now have again access to the forum (but I still don't know what went wrong!?!) Maarten (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.de)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Dear Spemcer, I have to disagree with your assumptions. Can you prove they do not run both grey and blay? You do know nothing about this, as you said. When I was in Billund a few month ago (september) they did. And when Jan Beyer (kind of our (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)  
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
(...) It depends on which 7 words you mean. I have seen a number of words used here in rtlT that I personally do think are inappropriate. (...) It is not the current policy to comment on who has or hasn't been given a timeout (a timeout is different (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Ugh...
 
(...) This has been bugging me, what do you mean by driver? I'm probably being dense. Steve (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Today's Challenge
 
(...) <snippage> (...) Thankyou, Claude. Now as to your further comments: I think that there is likely to be much merit in your words. I have not been able to transfer them into code as yet and so beg your further indulgence. In (very) pseudocode I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Well said. Good, bad or otherwise, the color change issue is destroying this community, and that's a shame. Lugnet used to be so much fun. Adrian (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)  
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <snip> (...) See!!!! Seriously, people better start realizing that LUGNET, but most especially, rtlT, is a really cool place to hang out. And again, I reiterate--what happened in o-t.foo should (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
 
(...) I don't remember if I did this for last year, but here's this year's. If there's interest, I can post last year's as well. Same limitations as before, deal with it :) Notice that Larry is still the loudest mouth, excep that he posted from 4 (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Listings
 
This is weekly update of new items listed at (URL) as of Thu Jan 20, 10:40 AM PST. To bid, review details of any item listed or to register go to (URL). There are currently 2374 listings! (2 URLs) 6600 Highway Construction '00 box/instructions> Used (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.auction, FTX)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
(...) - snip - (...) Chris, To my knowledge, this portion of the discussion is not a problem, and I don't believe there has been anything called out that you or Dave have written to cause a timeout. (Although the language is starting to get tinged (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
(...) At the ever increasing rate I see the 7 words get used around here (Lugnet in general, rtlT has been clean) I'm surprised to hear that anyone has gotten banned. If something that obvious doesn't get you a time out I don't know what does. Well (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) Oh look! I can still post! For crying out loud! It was off-topic.foo!!!!! If you want to get your knickers in a knot over something, try guys who spill ice tea on people's laps at (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
(...) Great Googley Moogley!!! Hey Chris! I have an Idea--why don't you go join Ken and Richard 'Ben' who also have inordinately large chips on their shoulders and you guys can form a club for those people who are pissed about the inconsequential (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) I have an issue with two things--one--if it's a "Psst Chris--don't talk about it or you'll get banned" thing then I wouldn't listen, and since I've received no such e-mail (and I'm the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
(...) oh really? HOW many people so FAR have been given a time out? ~I~ dont know. other than the people involved and the "banisher" anyone keeping score? SO FAR, all i have is a line or two from admins SAYING they have "handed out WAY too many" and (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
(...) I don't think they'd really do that... (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
(...) Dave are you ready for this..... I just was sent an e-mail warning me that this VERY discussion we are haveing ~COULD~ get me banned! NOW to be fair. this person was NOT an admin (rather someone in the know) but I have no reason to disbelive (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
I agree to the above letter and sign it: Daniel Jassim, age 31; Lawndale, California, U.S.A. I spent roughly $2,500 per year on Lego products, including theme park admission and purchases from 1999 to 2004. I estimate I've spent at least $25,000 on (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
 
  Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) And whereas I agree that the potential is there, I do not usually fall for the 'slippery slope' situation--if we're having a good time in o.t.foo and someone locks out your account in the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Skipped 10 messages in groups lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR