|
|
 | | Re: 2005
|
| (...) i (...) molto belli i set 8416 e 8421... ma il set 8420 mi delude un po... per me era meglio l' 8417..... ciao, Matteo. ps : rimane comunque l'incognita della "Enzo Ferrari" scala 1:10..... (21 years ago, 15-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
| | | | | Re: Restart of LDA Project (using LDraw models - L3P - POV)
|
| (...) Yes, that's why I also make this little humble program to see if my ideas work put to practice. (...) ... and that program crasches on all of my PC:s, expect the very first beta version he released... :(( (...) Maybe, maybe not. I recall James (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | fixing design flaws in #4483 (AT-AT)
|
| I got set 4483 (the AT-AT) for Christmas, and while it looks great (at least from below), it has zero play value, mostly because it falls apart when you touch it. Many of the design flaws (see (URL)) are actually fixable -- some of them pretty (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
| | | | | Some fun for Buffy and Angel fans
|
| Hi everyone, Palisades recently scored the license to one of my all-time favorite TV shows, Buffy the Vampire Slayer (RIP), and are making Kubrick-style "block" figures. I admit I picked up all the series I figures, but I still prefer my much cuter (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.parts.mod)
| | | | | AT-AT (#4483) - What were you thinking?
|
| I had read reviews saying that this model was fragile, but I had no idea how ridiculously fragile it was until I got one for Christmas. You literally can't touch it except in a few special places, without something breaking off. A quick run-down of (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-05, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
