|
|
 | | Re: Announcing Classic-Space Forums
|
| (...) Great work, guys! I added a link from the LUGNET homepage, to replace a couple of older announcements. --Todd (21 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update: What has TLC to do to bring YOU up against them?
|
| In lugnet.lego, Steven D. Weiser wrote: snipped some text to reduce it to something I'am confused about (...) Hi, in this discussion on lugnet.com almost everybody who wrote about collectors wrote in a very negative way. It seems as if in the (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| Why can't LEGO do both, and keep almost everyone happy? That is, LEGO gets to re-release any set, as long as the box is physically different from the original. That way, sets remain collectible, but bricks don't. "Bill Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| "Bill Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:I91w7E.1yL8@lugnet.com... (...) Now you (...) You (...) Why is it incredible? If LEGO was an airline, AFOLs would be the first class and business class frequent flyers, who bring in the most money (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: My average set
|
| (...) Mine is there for all to see: (URL) occasionally gets a little out of date, and it doesn't show sets I bought for parting out, or parts I've bought sans set, but you can't have everything ;) ROSCO (21 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
