Subject:
|
Re: 10152 Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:28:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8141 times
|
| |
| |
Why can't LEGO do both, and keep almost everyone happy? That is, LEGO gets
to re-release any set, as long as the box is physically different from the
original.
That way, sets remain collectible, but bricks don't.
"Bill Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:I91wGE.207w@lugnet.com...
> I wish they would rerelease monorail, Classic Space, and a bunch of other
> "collectible" things so people who want to build with them actually can without
> paying exhorbitant prices to such "collectors."
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| In lugnet.lego, Johannes Koehler wrote: ... While on the other (...) I applaud any effort by TLC to spoil the efforts of speculators to profit from the scarcity of a set. I wish they would rerelease monorail, Classic Space, and a bunch of other (...) (20 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
257 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|