|
|
 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| In lugnet.lego, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <snip> (...) No, it was exhausted. They are mixing up more (at the expense of Maersk). (...) This has nothing to do with marketing per se. If it had never been mentioned that this was the end of the line for (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
| (...) How can buying a set off the shelf be cheaper than a small number of parts off Bricklick ? I know BL is sometimes pricey, but you could mail 1 x N beams in an envelope connected together and wrapped in tape for $1.50-$2 ish pete.w (who used to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
| (...) Yep, dedicated people would help :^) Not that we aren't dedicated, just disorganised or just so laidback that we are unable to find a recliner on the market that satisfies our needs. pete.w (who has even more phantom strips now to send to Sue (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: My average set
|
| (...) Doesn't have anything to do with the average number of blue pieces in sets ? pete.w (not a color drone, a statistical drone) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: My average set
|
| Come on Richie, you have to give us more information than that. What is the metric you use to calculate the average? Set number? Pieces? Age of set? For the set re-releases, do you use the old set number, or the new set number? Also, what is your (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
