|
|
 | | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
| Basicly, I only need a small number of these beams in red. The local parts sellers I usually go to do not have any 1 x 12 beams in red in stock. If I can obtain them by buying a set that is on the shelf (or by buying something second hand locally (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: SPARTAN MK 1 My entry for the Military Hover-Vehicle Contest
|
| (...) When I first saw this on Brickshelf, before you posted it here, I looked at the background and thought to myself, "hmmm, studless, mind-bogglingly massive piece count, access to the water table, marked lack of interiors, is Keith posting MOCs (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Vorton Battle Midget
|
| Mmm...tank. (URL) Click the picture to learn its little secrets. Adrian (URL) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, FTX) !!
| | | | | Re: SPARTAN MK 1 My entry for the Military Hover-Vehicle Contest
|
| (...) Hey, I saw this thing on Brickshelf a few days ago, and thought it was pretty cool. It's got a neat shape, and some cool detailing. Also, your dio is pretty nice. The first thing I thought when I saw the pics was that it looked like Keith's (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) cool! please let us know when you find out how many more sets will be available as well as if the dark blue version will/will not be produced. i appreciate your letting us know! jason (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Um, no, there was some and is some bashing elsethread. But maybe I pre-empted some or most of it, which would be nice, with my prediction. (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| TLC never said that this was a "limited edition" set. What they said is that they used all their maresk blue up to make the first run of however many sets and that once they were gone, al;l the maresk blue would be gone and they wouldnt be able to (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) I think that I didn't make myself clear. All I am asking for is that the new run of 10152s be numbered "10153" or something. This simple change preserves the collectiblity of the 10052s. I wasn't suggesting any more radical change than that. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Shade, Mech for the SnowLeopard Clan Ninjas
|
| (...) snip I absolutely love the calves and feet. You've got to have clearance for the ankle to pivot side-to-side, but you were able to recess the pivot axis low enough so that the front-back click hinge joint isn't sticking way up. In fact, you (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) I thought I made it clear I don't condone the practice as you are putting it here. I'm not talking about cornering the current market, I'm talking about resale years down the road. (...) You said it..."everyone that wanted some had their (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
|
