To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *484588 (-5)
  Re: The Lego Logo
 
Remember it's not just what LEGO want to pursue, it is what they legally _have_ to pursue to maintain their trademarks and copyrights. The company may love for fan sites to show their logo and name prominently, but if they want to keep hold of their (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: 2648(2?) Container Grab
 
(...) Conventional wisdom is that imprints of the form N-NN are present to identify the indidual "well" in moulds that produce multiple copies of a part. Considering that the matching grip is 2649, I think it is highly likely that the part number (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)
 
  4512, 8436, 10159, 4504
 
(...) Ciao Guido, spero che i tre camion che ti ho mandato verranno catalizzati... Grazie per la recensione positiva. Vorrei precisare prima che ricapiti l'errore, che sbagliai a scrivere nel primo post il prezzo dell'8436... che non è 65,99 ma (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.it.itlug.market)
 
  Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
 
Hi Rob, (...) I tried a similar mechanism (a large inclined plane with a width reduction in the end), the problem is that LEGO balls are somewhat rough, and they tend to form a locked arch above width shrinking. I even tried to add a stirring (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
 
(...) Thanks, Bob! I hope you'll get as much pleasure building my arm as I got building your clock... Philo (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR