 | | Re: No one asked...
|
|
(...) Well, the Racers track is eight dots wide...and the train track clearance between is eight dots. Which would be fine if the Racers track was on the ground, but it's at like 8 bricks high or something, which might make it conflict with actual (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: No one asked...
|
|
(...) No. There isn't. I had two thoughts on this point. If we are running the large layout we don't use the section of track the gutter train crosses so it doesn't matter. Or I could build some sort of lift bridge for the gutter train. There is an (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
|
|
(...) There are, I believe, efforts ongoing behind the scenes to unify and improve the part number assignment/tracking/allocation process and this is one facet of that. I am not sure the principals in the matter are ready to speak out about it. (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Light seeker
|
|
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has any experience programming (NQC) a stationary |light seeking head? I have one made using a rotation sensor for reference, and 2 light sensors but can't seem to get the programming down. |Thanks |John Jordan (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks rtl(rlt, wink)Toronto
|
|
(...) The foil I've never heard of (I will remember than for good pies) but the fork pricks were apathy more than anything. I know I could have put more effort there but this was a test pie (which failed miserably--the filling was far too watery and (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
