Subject:
|
Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:09:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9043 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Jindrich Kubec wrote:
> Chris Dee wrote:
> > If the confusion between LDraw xNNN.dat (NNN.dat) numbers and peeron
> > xN, xNN, xNNN and xNNNN numbers is too great, we might need to
> > develop that policy sooner.
>
> Wouldn't it be best to create 'inventorying policy'? Inventorying is
> much faster than actually modelling the parts, so the {ldraw} part
> library is {in my eyes} just a subset of peeron library.
There are, I believe, efforts ongoing behind the scenes to unify and improve the
part number assignment/tracking/allocation process and this is one facet of
that. I am not sure the principals in the matter are ready to speak out about
it.
> And while you think about some new policies, some 'length' property for
> parts with variable lengths (strings, hoses, tubing) would be useful too.
There are more things to consider here than just length but I agree.
> Regarding inventories, there should be also a way to differentiate
> between two sets with the same model, same number, but different parts.
> This probably belongs somewhere else, but maybe Dan reads that ;-)
Try lugnet.db.inv ?
Good suggestions, keep them coming!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
