 | | Re: Wishful Thinking of AFOL
|
|
In lugnet.general, Lawrence Wilkes writes: <snippage> (...) <more snippage> If 'any' brick were to include the subset of red castle wall pieces with tudor decorative printing, then I think we are getting somewhere. Somehow I suspect it will not tho. (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 18-inch Lego Minifigures
|
|
(...) Would that be the one in the Natick Mall, or is there another LEGO booth around somewhere? J (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
|
(...) Well, the data format is a bit arcane but I'm not sure I'd characterise MLCad (to pick my favorite) as "antiquated"... it's pretty slick. But that's just my opinion, of course. It's been years since I last played with AutoCAD. I'd ask this, is (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
|
(...) Because some of use aren't so uptight about model designs that we feel the need to "protect" them from TLC, and would actually very much *like* to have instructions for our models, without having to suffer through an anitquated home-brewed CAD (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
|
(...) Ahh, yes. Another use for the scrambler. Give it the parts list you want, and have it emit a model using them to upload to TLC to place your order. If TLC is smart, they will have the input be a parts list, and then tell us how to upload just (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
