|
|
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I think that's too simple a dismissal. See my previous post about isolated facts and how they can add up to Really Big Secrets. "this fact by itself doesn't tell you much" is not a valid defense in and of itself. Besides, unless we're in the (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Pricing on Lego Sets
|
| (...) I think what you mean here is that until The LEGO Group redefines "play value" to what you want it to mean, or what you think it means, they have not recognized the importance of play value. But play value is all TLG talks about. Read their (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I am not sure if anyone major could change there production runs now. I suppose knowlege at the lower end of the food chain is much more powerful: If I were a toy shop and I knew TLC had an impressive range on the way - I may not buy (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Nuove strade
|
| (...) :-(((...((( Allora mi tengo le strade con le striscie bianche e verdi :-)) Ciao Ernesto P:S grazie per l'informazione (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Sets
|
| (...) they (...) Unless it comes with the imperial search squad that finds it in the desert? :-) Scott A (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Just Started 8479 Code Pilot Truck....
|
| (...) like. (...) Well, I agree and disagree. I don't think Advanced Builder should necessarily indicate someone who can read instructions well. Even in the 8448, there were times when the added parts were VERY difficult to find, either because they (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) No, I'm not implying that. I believe that it's possible that some things related to this might possibly potentially violate some privacy law somewhere, and I believe that it's potentially likely that some things related to this may be (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| "Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:Fz1A7r.MI3@lugnet.com... (...) not (...) Very true - imagine this scenario - You want a particular mini-figure, "Timmy", that is only available in a very large, very expensive set this year. (1) (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Nope. Nothing here was censored, which is confirmed by the (...) Really? (...) A thread? (...) Secret - TLG would say so, or at least that is what I am told :-) Scott A (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: New Catalogue
|
| (...) Cool, I'm in Central London this w/end - I may be able to pick one up :) (But they've put the lego department on the top floor! It takes _ages_ to get up there now, and my anticipation rises with every escalator... Steve (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
|
