|
 | | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
| On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, John Neal (<38B40110.28868009@...west.net>) wrote at 15:47:29 (...) That's where I was going as well. If it was compatible with the existing 9V stuff (in terms of usable parts), it would be monstrously good. (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |  | | Re: MLCad Suggestions
|
| (...) DAT->PostScript (...) MLCad (...) that (...) I would like to try to write a DAT->postcript converter if no one else is doing it. But give me some time. I just got a phostcript manual and it seems fairly easy to write a phostcript file. I just (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |  | | Re: Next meeting?...
|
| I'm always good as well. Craig, since Henry (Lim) and I were planning a visit to your place in mid-March (17 March -- he asked you about this, right? [grin])... we could potentially try for around then. Oh, wait, he's gotta leave on Saturday... so (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.org.us.dixielug)
| |  | | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
| (...) Agreed. (...) I could live with larger pieces, as long as they are the *right* pieces;-) Train fronts (split), nose shells, specialty items (fans), railings, new trucks. Let them accent play, give us the tools and we will accent the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |  | | Re: NEW Jambalaya Status Page
|
| Daniel, For the Technic box #1, please line-through Dave Hylands. He was part of the "Canada Tour". I mailed the box to Mark Haye once I had this discussion with Dave. Thanks, -Phil (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
Skipped 1 message in
group
lugnet.off-topic.fun (Skip-filter settings)
|