To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 30696
Subject: 
Pennsylvania RR H10s Power Functions Based Steam Engine
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.announce.moc
Followup-To: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:40:15 GMT
Highlighted: 
! (details)
Viewed: 
49707 times
  
I was waiting until the release of RailBricks #5 to post this. So now that it’s out I present.

Pennsylvania RR #7688






Pennsylvania RR #7688 was built by Lima Locomotive Works in September 1915. She was one of 445 H10s class 2-8-0 Consolidations built for the Pennsy and one of 45 to eventually receive automatic stokers. She is equipped with a 80P81a class tender.

She is now preserved at the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania in Stasburg Pennsylvania and is the only surviving Lima built PRR steam Locomotive.

My model of #7688 has a unique twist. It ditches the standard 9v train motors and uses a power functions based drive system inspired by Swoofty. If you want to know all the gory details about it works you can find my article on it in RailBricks #5.



Building this engine has given me hope for the future of LEGO Trains. #7688 was built with the PF elements currently available (which aren’t really geared for trains but are very versatile non the less) and has proven quite successful. Hopefully when the actual PF Train line is released things will only get better.

Flickr Gallery

Brickshelf Gallery

Pennsylvania RR F37b class Flat Car



The Pennsylvania RR built 17 of these F37B class flat cars between 1948 and 1952. The center of the car was completely open to allow a tall load to be carried as low as possible minimizing clearance issues.

The one thing I couldn’t fit in #7688’s tender was the battery box. So I chose to build a Pennsy F37b flat car with an electrical transformer load to hide the batteries. I’m hopping that the smaller rechargeable battery that will supposedly be released with the Power Functions Train line will allow me to eliminate the need for a battery car.

Flickr Gallery

Brickshelf Gallery

Cale




Subject: 
Re: Pennsylvania RR H10s Power Functions Based Steam Engine
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:11:45 GMT
Viewed: 
14085 times
  
Very nice!  I'm impressed at how you hid the PF battery box and components.
I've tried running the current PF setup in my modern locomotives, but with the
non-variable controller it is very rough going.

BTW, nice articles and pictures in RailBricks.  In my opinion, you are certainly
the best Steam builder that is still actively building.  (though after reading
the articles in RailBricks, I wonder about you steam builders opinion on
non-steam builders).

Great work!
Scott


Subject: 
Re: Pennsylvania RR H10s Power Functions Based Steam Engine
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:41:33 GMT
Viewed: 
14033 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Scott Wardlaw wrote:
Very nice!  I'm impressed at how you hid the PF battery box and components.
I've tried running the current PF setup in my modern locomotives, but with the
non-variable controller it is very rough going.


That is the downside of doing things with the current PF parts. I'm hopping that
when the new train specific stuff come out that it will be a pretty simple
retrofit. And if I can I'd like to work the new smaller rechargeable battery
that's so posed to come out into the tender as well. Eliminating the need for a
battery car. Though I do like the way the flat car turned out.

BTW, nice articles and pictures in RailBricks.  In my opinion, you are certainly
the best Steam builder that is still actively building.  (though after reading
the articles in RailBricks, I wonder about you steam builders opinion on
non-steam builders).

Great work!
Scott

Thanks. To be honest we think you non steam guys are just weird. :P

But seriously. Though I'm a steam era guy (even the diesels I've built so far
have been late steam era) I love to see any quality train MOC. Steam may be more
challenging to get running but you modern guys have plenty of challenge in
modeling paint schemes and body contours. I have a more modern engine I'm
working on (well if you consider an SD45 modern) and I can certainly appreciate
what you, and the other great diesel builders do.

Cale


Subject: 
Re: Pennsylvania RR H10s Power Functions Based Steam Engine
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:59:10 GMT
Viewed: 
14112 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Cale Leiphart wrote:
   I was waiting until the release of RailBricks #5 to post this. So now that it’s out I present.

Pennsylvania RR #7688

--snip--

   Pennsylvania RR #7688 was built by Lima Locomotive Works in September 1915. She was one of 445 H10s class 2-8-0 Consolidations built for the Pennsy and one of 45 to eventually receive automatic stokers. She is equipped with a 80P81a class tender.

She is now preserved at the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania in Stasburg Pennsylvania and is the only surviving Lima built PRR steam Locomotive.

My model of #7688 has a unique twist. It ditches the standard 9v train motors and uses a power functions based drive system inspired by Swoofty. If you want to know all the gory details about it works you can find my article on it in RailBricks #5.

Building this engine has given me hope for the future of LEGO Trains. #7688 was built with the PF elements currently available (which aren’t really geared for trains but are very versatile non the less) and has proven quite successful. Hopefully when the actual PF Train line is released things will only get better.

Brickshelf Gallery

--snip--

   Cale



Excellent variation of using PFS. We’re really beginning to see the potential of this system. When I spotted the two motors in your instructions I was immediately sold. Great work making it all look pretty.

Tim


Subject: 
Re: Pennsylvania RR H10s Power Functions Based Steam Engine
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:37:28 GMT
Viewed: 
14547 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:

  
Excellent variation of using PFS. We’re really beginning to see the potential of this system. When I spotted the two motors in your instructions I was immediately sold. Great work making it all look pretty.

Tim

Thanks I agree. There is some great potential in the new Power Functions system. I’m looking forward to the seeing the new train specific elements.

Cale


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR