 | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —James Brown
|
| | | (...) If you're trying to keep things squared up, the two magic numbers are 7 and 11. which is to say, a corner that keeps straights lined up with the normal Lego geometry can be one of 3 things: 4 curves 1 curve, 11 straights, 3 curves 2 curves, 7 (...) (22 years ago, 8-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | (...) This is very interesting... Is there a similar formula for a dog-leg? 1 curve, X straights, 1 curve the other way? What equations/formulae would you use to compute this? It's been way too many years since I studied trigonometry... --Bill. (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't have an equation, but I think one curve, 12 straights, one curve will do a dog-leg that is eight 32-stud baseplates long and 88 studs wide (3 baseplates minus 4 studs each side). -chris (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | | (...) THANK YOU!!! This works perfectly! I just tested it in Track Designer.... --Bill. (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | (...) Does it work perfectly or does it go over in length by at least a half a stud? I couldn't tell from Track Designer. -chris (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | | (...) It's close enough that TD considers it to be connected, and that's good enough for me. I used it for the yard design I just posted (q.v.) --Bill. (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) The 1-11-3 design isn't very close at all, according to Track Designer. Here's what I did: straight, curve right, 11 straights (5 switches and a straight, but that is equivalent), 3 curves right, cross-track. Then from the cross-track, a bunch (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —John Gramley
|
| | | | | (...) What does work is 1-13-3. It's close enough that Track Designer will consider it a closed loop. You can turn it into a triangle with a 5-13-7-12-4-5 pattern (starting with curves and alternating with straights). Then it's easy enough to see (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —John Gramley
|
| | | | | | (...) Oops. That should be the long leg and the hypoteneuse. John (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly? —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) John is correct; it's 1-13-3 that works. Blame my faulty memory, it's been a bit since I played in TD. (...) The 2-7-2 is close enough that it connects physically very soundly. The offset is roughly 1 stud. Easy enough to cover with slop, with (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
