 | | | | | |
In lugnet.technic, Matthew Crandall wrote:
| |
And dear friends at LEGO, if you’re reading this...please consider the
“adult” Technic thing.
|
Hi Matthew,
There are two things I’m sure right now:
First, TLC won’t answer positively to any and every demand.
Second, TLC is listening to us, they are listening to us sincerly. They are
listening to us more than I ever dream.
Didier
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.technic, Didier Enjary wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Matthew Crandall wrote:
| |
And dear friends at LEGO, if you’re reading this...please consider the
“adult” Technic thing.
|
Hi Matthew,
There are two things I’m sure right now:
First, TLC won’t answer positively to any and every demand.
Second, TLC is listening to us, they are listening to us sincerly. They are
listening to us more than I ever dream.
Didier
|
Didier--
I am not “demanding” anything!
Far too many times here on Lugnet, I have seen some really nasty comments. I
wouldn’t blame TLC for shutting us all out at times. After attending Brickfest
2007, I know they are listening, and taking notes. That is encouraging, to say
the least.
I also know that TLC is a company that has to show a profit, and that profit is
in stuff that sells (mostly) to those 16 and under. AFOL’s are a small (but
growing) segment of that market.
All I asked for is that they consider an “adult” Technic. If that came across
as a demand...then I am sorry, because that’s not what I intended it to be.
Play Well and Prosper,
Matthew
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.technic, Matthew Crandall wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Didier Enjary wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Matthew Crandall wrote:
|
|
| |
I am not “demanding” anything!
|
I’m sorry, my english is not so good and “demand” was probably not the best word
to express my mind.
| |
Far too many times here on Lugnet, I have seen some really nasty comments. I
wouldn’t blame TLC for shutting us all out at times. After attending
Brickfest 2007, I know they are listening, and taking notes. That is
encouraging, to say the least.
I also know that TLC is a company that has to show a profit, and that profit
is in stuff that sells (mostly) to those 16 and under. AFOL’s are a small
(but growing) segment of that market.
All I asked for is that they consider an “adult” Technic. If that came
across as a demand...then I am sorry, because that’s not what I intended it
to be.
|
No, no. That’s great comment IMHO.
Didier
| |
Play Well and Prosper,
Matthew
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.technic, Didier Enjary wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Matthew Crandall wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Didier Enjary wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Matthew Crandall wrote:
|
|
| |
I am not “demanding” anything!
|
I’m sorry, my english is not so good and “demand” was probably not the best
word to express my mind.
| |
Far too many times here on Lugnet, I have seen some really nasty comments. I
wouldn’t blame TLC for shutting us all out at times. After attending
Brickfest 2007, I know they are listening, and taking notes. That is
encouraging, to say the least.
I also know that TLC is a company that has to show a profit, and that profit
is in stuff that sells (mostly) to those 16 and under. AFOL’s are a small
(but growing) segment of that market.
All I asked for is that they consider an “adult” Technic. If that came
across as a demand...then I am sorry, because that’s not what I intended it
to be.
|
No, no. That’s great comment IMHO.
Didier
| |
Play Well and Prosper,
Matthew
|
|
Didier--
Thanks for explaining the English thing. In theory, it’s my native language.
That doen’t mean I grasp it at all!
**grins**
The one drawback to posting or e-mail is that you can’t see the body language or
facial expression, and hear the tone of voice that one uses. Therefore, it
sometimes looks like something is being said in one direction, when in fact it’s
totally the opposite. ‘nuff said.
Thanks also for the kind words. Hope things are well for you!
Play Well and Prosper,
Matthew
| | | | | | |
