 | | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon —Tom McDonald
|
| | | (...) I'm jumping in here late, so forgive me if this had already been mentioned. To me it seems a ship cockpit canopy or AT-AT 'head' would have to be at least six studs wide rather than use the one-piece ~5-stud passenger compartments found in the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | (...) This may be appocryphal, because I don't have the piece in front of me, but doesn' t the piece in question have a stud (representing door handles) on the outside of the "door" panels? If so (Again, I'm not sure about this), one could seal up (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) least (...) with a (...) like (...) inside (...) doesn' (...) outside of (...) the (...) It's not appocryphal. And I'm a bit surprised that it's *you* that even thought it could be ;-) Yes, that piece has studs representing door handles. I (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
