 | | | | | |
In lugnet.space, Allister McLaren wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
I was trying to imply simplicity in operation. The Grand Fuhrer, might not
be terribly bright, for instance, and could cope with nothing more complex
than simple scoort controls.
|
This sort of post-hoc rationalisation for shoddy work is more popularly known
as ‘continually laying bubble’, after a certain semi-famous
thread.
|
Well, it wasn’t a post-hoc rationalisation. But you’re saying that if I want to
imply simplicity, then I have to do so in a complex way?
Interesting, but this:
| |
Keep layin’ it(1), bubble boy. 3o:) (2)
|
???
Whatever.
So much for your constructive criticism.
Regards
Richie Dulin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.space, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
So much for your constructive criticism.
|
Many apologies. I was attempting to engage in this ‘smack talk’ thing that seems
to be all the rage, apparently without success. Didn’t mean to offend.
Cheers,
Allister
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.space, Allister McLaren wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
So much for your constructive criticism.
|
Many apologies. I was attempting to engage in this ‘smack talk’ thing that
seems to be all the rage, apparently without success. Didn’t mean to offend.
|
My apologies too Allister. You’re one of the very few who’ve posted something
constructive in this thread. I over-reacted to your ‘smack talk’ (I have a
personal connection to a ‘bubble boy’, so I tend to think using the term as a
put-down is in particularly bad taste).
This thread has been a real drain on my emotional capital, and I have been
trying to get a proper explanation together. I will post it soon.
Cheers
Richie Dulin
| | | | | | |
