| |
Here’s the tiny Teardrop:
I’m very happy
with the appearance, but the features are lacking. The landing gear is of
questionable stability and the canopy doesn’t open- and with 8 studs of binding
surface and no good edges to grab, it’s actually pretty tough to remove.
(grumble, grumble, stupid canopy part design...)
And... uh... I haven’t put
much flavor text in with many of my models in the last couple of years. It
looks like I was trying to make up for that here. There is way more than the
usual amount of techno-babble and other pointless rambling.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Space MOC: Teardrop
|
| (...) Hmmm...well, I like the shape and the landing gear... ...but... ...IMHO... I HATE THE COLORS! Sorry to be blunt, but none of them seem to match one another and the trans-red canopy look waaa...aaay out of place. I think the ship would look (...) (20 years ago, 24-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | Re: Space MOC: Teardrop
|
| (...) snip (...) I like the shape of this ship, especially the slopes that extend over the engines, and the engines themselves. I don't like the way that the gray parts and the white ones are isolated from eachother though. I think it might behoove (...) (20 years ago, 24-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | Re: Space MOC: Teardrop
|
| (...) Landing gear is a feature. And the ship uses a pair of my favourite element ;-) (...) Dude, that's my favourite canopy! Three of my MOCs have just such an opening canopy, in a similar size range (using two different solutions). I guess I'll (...) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
