Subject:
|
Re: Development status
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Sat, 25 Nov 2006 23:05:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
14837 times
|
| |
|
|
Michael Obenland wrote:
> I think we all want to get (or have it already) a NXT brick. BrickOS was
> not changed in the last year, as I remember. But it is a great way to do
> real programming and I wish to have someting like a nxtOS. :)
Santa thinks I haven't played enough with my RCX since I got
it, so he won't give me a NXT just yet. ;-)
> > and if I should volunteer to get the code to a state where
> > it compiles wih gcc 4.x without warnings.
>
> That sounds great for me. I use my good old RCX and brickOS, actually
> with a gcc < 4.x toolchain. It works, but if it could work better...
Aside from some signedness warnings and a missing function for
converting unsigned to float, brickOS compiles nicely with gcc HEAD.
Patch: http://carl.troein.com/brickos/ct_signedness.diff
And I should test with some slightly older version of gcc too.
//Carl
--
Carl Troein - carl@thep.lu.se
http://www.thep.lu.se/~carl/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Development status
|
| Hi Carl, I think we all want to get (or have it already) a NXT brick. BrickOS was not changed in the last year, as I remember. But it is a great way to do real programming and I wish to have someting like a nxtOS. :) (...) That sounds great for me. (...) (17 years ago, 24-Nov-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
