 | | Re: mindstorms NXT - 90 degree. —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | (...) Ahhh. The power of listening. If you read the "wired" article, you'll know I made that piece. Well, actually, we made it. We (the MUPs) were quick to point out (exactly like you did) that it's very hard to do 90 degree studless connections (in (...) (18 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: mindstorms NXT - 90 degree. —Ignacio Martinez Vazquez
|
| | | | | (...) Epic. (18 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: mindstorms NXT - 90 degree. —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote: <snip> (...) And I thank you for speaking for us. If you were in the area, I'd give you a hug to thank you. But alas.... :) Dave K (18 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: mindstorms NXT - 90 degree. —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | (...) This is the exact reason why it took me so long to warm to studless construction, When I gave it a try I found it very hard to build stable 3 dimensional boxes. Lately I've been using it successfully in two dimensions allied to conventional (...) (18 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: mindstorms NXT - 90 degree. —Rob Antonishen
|
| | | | | | (...) Not that hard really - Most of the studless sets I have played with are not beam type constructions in 3D. They all tend to be layers of 2D beams pinned together like sandwiches. If you look at most of the new studless technic sets the large (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: mindstorms NXT - 90 degree. —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | | (...) Or do what I do. Don't bother with (entirely) studless, and buy secondhand studded off Ebay or Bricklink. Steve (18 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: mindstorms NXT - 90 degree. —Brian Davis
|
| | | | (...) LEGO, thank you for listening, in ways we never suspected... MUPs, Ambassadors, AFOLs (you know who you are), thank you for speaking for us. Dave, I'll give him a hug for you the next time I see him. Well, if I can stop pumping him for (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
