To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.piratesOpen lugnet.pirates in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Pirates / 4292
     
   
Subject: 
Re: The barque Dodelijke Klompschoen
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:10:38 GMT
Viewed: 
5174 times
  

In lugnet.pirates, Robert van Dijk wrote:
   Well Richie, that’s certainly a ‘big’ ship there.

However, one sidenote: The name should be ‘Dodelijke Klompschoen’ (notice the extra e) I am not exactly sure what the name is supposed to mean since ‘Klompschoen’ is not an existing dutch word. ‘dodelijke’ means ‘deadly’, ‘schoen’ means ‘shoe’ but ‘klomp’ has two different meanings: ‘Clog’ or ‘lump/slug’

So the tranlation should be: ‘Deadly Clogshoe’ which is quite silly or ‘Deadly Lumpshoe’. That sounds just as bad in my opinion......

I used an online translator. The idea was ‘Deadly Clog’ (which is quite silly). I did mean to include a note/apology to dutch speakers in my post, but forgot to add it in all the excitement of the moment.

   And completely off-topic:

In your Custom wide-hull thread you said that the use of more than 4 16-wide center hullpieces makes a ship look too narrow.


No I did not!!! What I said was “While I still maintain my view that six hull sections isn’t necessarily canoelike, what spurred me to do this cutting was the desire for more deck space.”. Click on the link to see my views on ‘too narrowness’.

   Well, I’ve build** quite alot of pirate ships, including one with five centerpieces and it has quite the lengthwith proportions of a real 18th century ship.

Absolutely!

   ** Since I do not own a single real LEGO piece I build solely ‘virtual’ on the computer using LDraw/LeoCAD Unfortunately, I’m still missing the virtual parts for the mast middle piece and the 27-long rigging. When these are available I will post some images of my ships........

Cool.

Cheers

Richie Dulin

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: The barque Dodelijke Klompschoen
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:14:50 GMT
Viewed: 
5303 times
  

In lugnet.pirates, Richie Dulin wrote:
  
I used an online translator. The idea was ‘Deadly Clog’ (which is quite silly). I did mean to include a note/apology to dutch speakers in my post, but forgot to add it in all the excitement of the moment.

Ok, Well that’s cleared up then (BUT WE HAD OUR FUN AND IT DOES LOOK LIKE A CLOG!!) and for the sake of completeness: the name should be: Dodelijke Klomp (What’s with the captain’s name: ‘Puntblazer’ HaHaHa I don’t even dare to try to translate that......)

And my apologies for misunderstanding the Centre-pieces thingie, I completely agree with you on the lack of deck space with only 16 studs.

There is still a question I want to ask you: Why do you mainly build early 19th century ships while the ‘Pirate Golden Age’ was around 1690-1730? (I also think that ships from that period looked a bit better with those high sterncastles)

Robin

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: The barque Dodelijke Klompschoen
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:37:24 GMT
Viewed: 
5339 times
  

In lugnet.pirates, Robert van Dijk wrote:
   In lugnet.pirates, Richie Dulin wrote:
  
I used an online translator. The idea was ‘Deadly Clog’ (which is quite silly). I did mean to include a note/apology to dutch speakers in my post, but forgot to add it in all the excitement of the moment.

Ok, Well that’s cleared up then (BUT WE HAD OUR FUN AND IT DOES LOOK LIKE A CLOG!!) and for the sake of completeness: the name should be: Dodelijke Klomp (What’s with the captain’s name: ‘Puntblazer’ HaHaHa I don’t even dare to try to translate that......)

;-)

   And my apologies for misunderstanding the Centre-pieces thingie, I completely agree with you on the lack of deck space with only 16 studs.

The deck of the Dodelijke Klomp is certainly an improvement in width over the other Port Brique ships. I’m looking forward to being able to include a lot more deck detailing on the new Misérable.

   There is still a question I want to ask you: Why do you mainly build early 19th century ships while the ‘Pirate Golden Age’ was around 1690-1730? (I also think that ships from that period looked a bit better with those high sterncastles)

Take your pick:
  • Port Brique is set in Terra Australis... not much was settled in Australia prior to the 1788. Of course the French settlement of 1788 never came about, but one can dream...
  • The Napoleonic conflicts have more potential than pirates attack/pirates get attacked.
  • I can’t build convincing looking high sterncastles.
Perhaps once the possibilities of Port Brique 1805 (possibly 1806 by the time I get there!) are exhausted (and there’s not too much more to do), I’ll shift to a different time period. After all, I’ve accumulated a lot of shipbuilding parts...I’ll just need to figure out how to build convincing high sterncastles!

Cheers

Richie Dulin

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR