To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.piratesOpen lugnet.pirates in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Pirates / 4186
     
   
Subject: 
Re: Secret testing of a new cannon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:06:20 GMT
Viewed: 
6243 times
  

In lugnet.pirates, Richie Dulin wrote:
   In lugnet.pirates, Kurt Baty wrote:
   To: Cmdr. Naval Weapons Development RTN HQ. Galveston

From: Capt. Counter-Intelligence Texas Rangers

We have intercepted communications coming out of the Mexican spy network in and around Galveston. They are reporting on the noise of testing of “very large” cannons and the large shipments of iron ore coming to Galveston from Llano. They also report on someone named “Joneriksun” who they think is involved. I don’t know what you are developing, but I hope it’s good enough. Because it looks like we could soon be back to open war with Mexico.

Jack

On a small sand island in a bayou not to far from Galveston Secret testing of one of the new cannons continues!

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=117737

why pirates? (recall what Sam Houston said about us)

so what do you think?

I think that if you keep up the development, you’ll be attempting a pirate-era moonshot before long!


I am confused!?

The Texas Navy had a steam powered warship in 1838! “Predating any self-propelled vessels built by the U.S. Navy, Zavala had the distinction of becoming the first armed (steam) warship in North America.”

http://www.numa.net/articles/texas_naval_ship_zavala.html

Do you think my cannon design is wrong? I put my modeling date at 1845. These big smooth cannons were under development at that time.

The “Oregon” gon started it off in 1843

I wish, I could find a picture of it!

For more info on Ericsson, “Oregon” gun, and the U.S.S. Princeton see:

http://www.northwestships.com/Oregon%20Gun.htm

but soon!

15 inch Dahlgren(s)

http://members.tripod.com/~ProlificPains/dahl.jpg

http://www.ijnhonline.org/howard_special/The_Guns_at_Filipstad_pics_docs/Brooklyn%20Navy%20Yard%2015-in%20Dahlgrens.jpg

http://www.ijnhonline.org/howard_special/The_Guns_at_Filipstad_pics_docs/15%20inch%20Dahlgren%20smoothbore.jpg

15 inch Rodmans

http://www.civilwarartillery.com/cannon/15inchCannons.jpg>

Armstrong

http://www.mmcwrt.org/images/ArmstrongGun.jpg


other models

http://www.dicannonworks.com/images/bottleE.jpg

http://www.cannon-mania.com/images/Rhodes/dg-fin.gif

Look at the HMS Warrior

http://www.stvincent.ac.uk/Heritage/Warrior/guns.html


   Roll on Columbiad! (But rightfully in Texas, not Florida!)

I am just building some “what ifs” here for fun!!

all best

kurt

  
Cheers

Richie Dulin

   
         
     
Subject: 
Re: Secret testing of a new cannon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:34:12 GMT
Viewed: 
6387 times
  

In lugnet.pirates, Kurt Baty wrote:
   In lugnet.pirates, Richie Dulin wrote:
   In lugnet.pirates, Kurt Baty wrote:
   To: Cmdr. Naval Weapons Development RTN HQ. Galveston

From: Capt. Counter-Intelligence Texas Rangers

We have intercepted communications coming out of the Mexican spy network in and around Galveston. They are reporting on the noise of testing of “very large” cannons and the large shipments of iron ore coming to Galveston from Llano. They also report on someone named “Joneriksun” who they think is involved. I don’t know what you are developing, but I hope it’s good enough. Because it looks like we could soon be back to open war with Mexico.

Jack

On a small sand island in a bayou not to far from Galveston Secret testing of one of the new cannons continues!

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=117737

why pirates? (recall what Sam Houston said about us)

so what do you think?

I think that if you keep up the development, you’ll be attempting a pirate-era moonshot before long!


I am confused!?

The Texas Navy had a steam powered warship in 1838! “Predating any self-propelled vessels built by the U.S. Navy, Zavala had the distinction of becoming the first armed (steam) warship in North America.”

http://www.numa.net/articles/texas_naval_ship_zavala.html

Do you think my cannon design is wrong? I put my modeling date at 1845. These big smooth cannons were under development at that time.

-snip-

No, No! Not wrong by any means! Pirate-era moonshot from gun development, is a reference to Jules Verne’s From the Earth to the Moon.... where they attempted a moonshot from a very large gun...

I’m not meaning to question your ballistics technology development!

  
   Roll on Columbiad! (But rightfully in Texas, not Florida!)

I am just building some “what ifs” here for fun!!

The very large gun for the moonshot was named Columbiad, and there was considerable discussion (and public rallies) about whether it should be built in Florida or Texas.

JV’s novel was set, iirc, shortly after the ACW, so with your 1845 developments, you might just beat it!

Cheers

Richie Dulin

    
          
     
Subject: 
Re: Secret testing of a new cannon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 02:31:08 GMT
Viewed: 
6339 times
  

In lugnet.pirates, Richie Dulin wrote:
   In lugnet.pirates, Kurt Baty wrote:
   In lugnet.pirates, Richie Dulin wrote:
   In lugnet.pirates, Kurt Baty wrote:
   To: Cmdr. Naval Weapons Development RTN HQ. Galveston

From: Capt. Counter-Intelligence Texas Rangers

We have intercepted communications coming out of the Mexican spy network in and around Galveston. They are reporting on the noise of testing of “very large” cannons and the large shipments of iron ore coming to Galveston from Llano. They also report on someone named “Joneriksun” who they think is involved. I don’t know what you are developing, but I hope it’s good enough. Because it looks like we could soon be back to open war with Mexico.

Jack

On a small sand island in a bayou not to far from Galveston Secret testing of one of the new cannons continues!

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=117737

why pirates? (recall what Sam Houston said about us)

so what do you think?

I think that if you keep up the development, you’ll be attempting a pirate-era moonshot before long!


I am confused!?

The Texas Navy had a steam powered warship in 1838! “Predating any self-propelled vessels built by the U.S. Navy, Zavala had the distinction of becoming the first armed (steam) warship in North America.”

http://www.numa.net/articles/texas_naval_ship_zavala.html

Do you think my cannon design is wrong? I put my modeling date at 1845. These big smooth cannons were under development at that time.

-snip-

No, No! Not wrong by any means! Pirate-era moonshot from gun development, is a reference to Jules Verne’s From the Earth to the Moon.... where they attempted a moonshot from a very large gun...

OK!!

  
I’m not meaning to question your ballistics technology development!

Thanks, but you are allowed!

  
  
   Roll on Columbiad! (But rightfully in Texas, not Florida!)

I am just building some “what ifs” here for fun!!

The very large gun for the moonshot was named Columbiad, and there was considerable discussion (and public rallies) about whether it should be built in Florida or Texas.

Actually Verne reused the name, in “From the Earth to the Moon” 1865. see:

http://www.cwartillery.org/ve/seahow.html

Columbiad(s) are a little to small, ;^)

My cannon is in the 15 inch range.

So you can see how I missed your reference!

  
JV’s novel was set, iirc, shortly after the ACW, so with your 1845 developments, you might just beat it!

Verne may a have heard about or see pictures of the 20 inch and above guns

http://www.cwartillery.org/ve/dahlXXgray2.jpg

http://www.ijnhonline.org/howard_special/The_Guns_at_Filipstad_pics_docs/20-in%20Rodman%20side.jpg


kurt

  
Cheers

Richie Dulin

   
         
     
Subject: 
Re: Secret testing of a new cannon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:32:07 GMT
Viewed: 
6137 times
  

Hi Kurt

In lugnet.pirates, Kurt Baty wrote:
   The Texas Navy had a steam powered warship in 1838! “Predating any self-propelled vessels built by the U.S. Navy, Zavala had the distinction of becoming the first armed (steam) warship in North America.”

http://www.numa.net/articles/texas_naval_ship_zavala.html

Um - I think the Texans might have been nosed out by the Royal Navy. :) The British were using steam-powered gunboats on the St. Lawrence river and Lake Ontario in the winter of 1837-1838 to counter what today would be called terrorists attacking from the United States into British North America.

Regards,


Norbert Black

   
         
   
Subject: 
Correction re: steam warships, dates of service.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:00:40 GMT
Viewed: 
6422 times
  

In lugnet.pirates, Kurt Baty wrote:

   I am confused!?

The Texas Navy had a steam powered warship in 1838! “Predating any self-propelled vessels built by the U.S. Navy, Zavala had the distinction of becoming the first armed (steam) warship in North America.”

http://www.numa.net/articles/texas_naval_ship_zavala.html

That page is incorrect.

The first steam-powered armed warship in North America was in fact Robert Fulton’s catamaran-hulled center-paddler Demologos, completed in 1815 for the defence of New York and kept in service by the US Navy until its destruction in an accident in 1829.

http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi156.htm

all best

LFB

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: Correction re: steam warships, dates of service.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:24:07 GMT
Viewed: 
6340 times
  

In lugnet.pirates, Lindsay Frederick Braun wrote:
   In lugnet.pirates, Kurt Baty wrote:

   I am confused!?

The Texas Navy had a steam powered warship in 1838! “Predating any self-propelled vessels built by the U.S. Navy, Zavala had the distinction of becoming the first armed (steam) warship in North America.”

http://www.numa.net/articles/texas_naval_ship_zavala.html

That page is incorrect.

The first steam-powered armed warship in North America was in fact Robert Fulton’s catamaran-hulled center-paddler Demologos, completed in 1815 for the defence of New York and kept in service by the US Navy until its destruction in an accident in 1829.

http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi156.htm

I agree with Lindsay!

kurt


  
all best

LFB

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR