To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 13135
13134  |  13136
Subject: 
Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:10:17 GMT
Viewed: 
2378 times
  
I also think that, whilst you may not know Derek, I know him to be a
pretty even tempered sort of fellow.  So ytou lumped Derek in with all those
mean nasty profane individuals who used bad language.

It's true, I don't know Derek.  I'm sure he's a nice guy.  For all you know, I
might be too.  But Derek's last post wasn't "nice."  My response was
commesurate.

you grouped us all together.

You criticize me, and yet you call me "obsessed", and lump me with quite a few
groups of "obsessed" people.

Serioulsy, if all they ever hear coiming from the AFOL community is > bitchiness AFOL community is bitchiness--

Really? Is that all they hear?  Or perhaps that's all you've heard?  In recent
weeks, besides writing in favor of greys, I have also written in praise of Jake
and of several new sets. But I guess you weren't interested in any of those
posts.

Obsessed.  Take a step back, go outside and get some air, and phrase you
concern politely, without maliciousness or sarcasm, especially if you want
them to even consider the request.

Actually, I've never bothered TLC about the bleys.  I don't expect them to
listen to me or to do anything that they don't want.  However, they are a
business, and I am their customer, and as such I'll express my opinion about
their product on this site if it pleases me to do so, as long as the
administrators do not object to it.

I have never been "malicious" with my posts.  I'm sorry if you've thought so.
However, my last post WAS (intentionally) sarcastic.  However, as stated before,
my response was commesurate.

you're not going to buy anywith the new bley?

That's your assumption, which is incorrect.

Fine--more for me and those of us who like LEGO as a hobby.

I do too, otherwise I wouldn't be posting here.  Just because I disagree with
you on an issue doesn't change that.

TLC isn't going to lose out on my purchases--they're getting more.

More power to them, and to you.

Dave K
-yes I was getting snippy towards the end of that rant.

You're entitled to.  Peace - Tanvir.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) I did say we were bothguilty of it. So there you are. (...) And you weren't interested in any of my posts that were not 'kissups to TLC' or me stating that I wasn't in the 'anti-colourchange' camp. So we're both doing it--where, in the end, (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) I thnk we really have to stop misinterpreting people around here. Maybe there's an ESL thing going on, but I know I'm not in the 'anti-bringbackoldcolours' camp. I would definitely state, for the record, that if TLC chose to bring back old (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR