| | | | | Todd,
Here are the dates for Dixie LUG:
1st meeting of DixieLUG - 22 January 2000
2nd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 April 2000
3rd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 July 2000
4th meeting of DixieLUG - 26 August 2000
Thanks,
Franklin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | In lugnet.org, "Franklin W. Cain" <fwcain@yahoo.com> writes:
> Here are the dates for Dixie LUG:
> 1st meeting of DixieLUG - 22 January 2000
> 2nd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 April 2000
> 3rd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 July 2000
> 4th meeting of DixieLUG - 26 August 2000
OK, so is 22 Jan 2000 the "official" date that your organization was formed?
Or was that just its first official meeting?
If I'm reading this post correctly...
http://news.lugnet.com/loc/us/ga/?n=54
...DixieLUG came into being on 19 Dec 1999?
--Todd
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> In lugnet.org, "Franklin W. Cain" <fwcain@yahoo.com> writes:
> >
> > Here are the dates for Dixie LUG:
> > 1st meeting of DixieLUG - 22 January 2000
> > 2nd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 April 2000
> > 3rd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 July 2000
> > 4th meeting of DixieLUG - 26 August 2000
>
> OK, so is 22 Jan 2000 the "official" date that your organization
> was formed? Or was that just its first official meeting?
First ever face-to-face meeting. (...I'm hesitant to use the word
"official", though, in response to some spirited discussion quite
a while ago regarding which term to use: "members" vs. "attendees".
One of the more vigorously defended opinions -- by whom,
I no longer recall -- was that the term "members" would be too
formal and officious, so we agreed to stay informal and relaxed.
Just simple, laid-back Southern behavior. ;-)
> If I'm reading this post correctly...
> http://news.lugnet.com/loc/us/ga/?n=54
> ...DixieLUG came into being on 19 Dec 1999?
OK. That works for me.
I hope that recollections have been of assistance. ;-)
Thanks,
Franklin
PS,
In case I've not yet said so, CONGRATULATIONS on y'all's upcoming marriage.
| | | | | | |