To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6663
6662  |  6664
Subject: 
Re: My point.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:38:18 GMT
Viewed: 
583 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Joslin writes:

Beleive it or not, I've never posted anything anywhere on Lugnet that I would
consider to be a flame.

It is not what you consider to be a flame which is important - do you agree?

In all seriousness, I don't understand your question, mostly because if it were
communicated verbally, there would have been emphasis on one word or another to
give me a clue what you meant.

I'll assume what you meant is:  "It's not what *you* consider to be a flame
which is important", ie, other people's call on whether or not something you
wrote is a flame is what is really important, not your own opinion (that seems
to be the most likely interpretation of your question, given what I assume
you're getting at- if it's wrong, please let me know).

I have to disagree, sorry.  I'm sure you feel that I've flamed you at various
points, but the fact is, while I have disagree vehemently with some of your
actions and statements, and have said so plainly (and in words that probably
got you all riled up), I have never made personal insults against you, I've
never posted defamatory things about you *just* to upset you, and I've always
kept my comments confined to the actual disagreement at hand.  To me, that
spells exactly that- "disagreement", not "flaming".

Trust me, were I to flame you, you'd instantly know the difference.

eric



Message has 2 Replies:
  (canceled)
 
  Re: My point.
 
(...) would (...) agree? (...) were (...) another to (...) *You* must find it *really* hard to read books if there are *no* pointers to the *important* words in the sentences? Perhaps *your* mother underlines them for *you*? :-) (...) you (...) (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My point.
 
(...) is (...) It is not what you consider to be a flame which is important - do you agree? (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)

29 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR