To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.mediawatchOpen lugnet.mediawatch in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 MediaWatch / 406
405  |  407
Subject: 
Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.mediawatch
Date: 
Fri, 21 Dec 2001 21:32:25 GMT
Viewed: 
1840 times
  
"John" <johnneal@qwest.net> writes:
In lugnet.mediawatch, Jason Rowoldt writes:
First, it looks like the discussion here has dengenerated into a
gay/anti-gay or rather freedom of gender/sexual orientation portrayal of
minifigs.  I'll try to stay away from that whole topic and focus more on the
relavant issue at hand, which is really at the core of this group and what
we are.

No, to me the issue at hand is the lack of responsibility and common sense on
your part.  Creating "adult" movies out of LEGO MFs is just plain stupid and
tasteless.

The phrase "adult movies" has become a euphemism for pornography, but
I believe Jason meant it in the sense of "movies targeted at adults",
which is what most of the films you see in theatres are.  Adult
characters, themes, situations - not pornography.  It was an
unfortunate choice of words.

To me, LEGO bricks are a hobby.  They are a really fun thing to collect and
to to build with for many of us.  I know that some of us have started
reselling LEGO bricks via Brickbay, some of us have done commissioned works
for LEGO sculptures, and some of us have made movies.  I'm one of the ones
that makes movies.

Oh, really Jason?  Are all LEGO hobbies that equal?  I sell bricks
on Brickbay, you display LEGO porn-- sorry, I don't buy it.

If you go to the theatre and see a movie that includes a love scene
where two characters are having sex, do you call that a porn film?  I
wouldn't.  It might be "R" rated, but it isn't porn.  That's the type
of film that Jason is defending, not a XXX explicit pornographic film.

--Bill.

--
William R Ward            bill@wards.net          http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) Well, I hear about MFs being depicted as gay. How else can one know the sexual orientation of a MF unless one sees that MF engaging in sexual activity. Depictions of sex is the definition of pornography. (...) If it were just one or two (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) No, to me the issue at hand is the lack of responsibility and common sense on your part. Creating "adult" movies out of LEGO MFs is just plain stupid and tasteless. (...) Oh, really Jason? Are all LEGO hobbies that equal? I sell bricks on (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR