 | | Re: FOTW-1349 Studio Set —David W. Speck
|
| | | In lugnet.market.shopping, Dave Johann writes: <snip>... (...) Again, I'm not so sure it's obviously a return, I'm finding a large number of sets being torn open on the shelves and stripped of important parts. I'm in the Hudson Valley of NY, and (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: FOTW-1349 Studio Set —Tom Reed
|
| | | | | (...) Actually what I found happening at my Target was that they stood the sets up on their side to display them. The weight of the train stuff inside caused the seals to give way and for some of the parts to spill out. I tried to push the contents (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: FOTW-1349 Studio Set —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | | | (...) Those little boxes ($1.97 at walmart ?) are probably the single most ravaged item I have observed. Most stores have anywhere from 1-10 of those already broken into. Next time, perhaps TLC should put that type of item in a really strong polybag (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: FOTW-1349 Studio Set —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | (...) They've already taken steps to secure these boxes. The older style box had the traditional Lego pulltab in back. The newer ones don't. The new boxes are very tough to open and consequently, I've noticed fewer instances of Kanohi theft. -Dave (22 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: FOTW-1349 Studio Set —Dave Johann
|
| | | | (...) The reasons why I suspect it was a returned item: 1) It was resealed like new 2) the instructions were obviously well used. 3) many of the bags were opend just enough to allow for the passage of certain parts while keeping others inside. These (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| | | | |
