| |
In lugnet.loc.uk, Simon Bennett writes:
<snip>
> I have now sent the letter. I didn't change it that much and it's still
> very long but I wanted to get it out there before I got cold feet about
> sending it at all!
<snip>
You rock. Very nicely done. I think I speak for a number of people when I
say "thanks for doing this, well done!"
++Lar
|
|
| |
In lugnet.loc.uk, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> You rock. Very nicely done. I think I speak for a number of people when I
> say "thanks for doing this, well done!"
>
> ++Lar
Cheers Larry, I've got a nice warm Lugnetty 'included' feeling now! All we
have to do now is just sit back and watch New Civil Engineer not publish it!
Psi
|
|
| |
Steve wrote:
> My kid was raised on Lego *and* Meccano *and* Lincoln Logs *and* Knex
> *and* Construx *and* Girder-and-Panel *and* balsa-wood+glue *and*
> Anatomics
> (you build dinosaur skeletons from a bunch of 'bones' that snap together
> using ball-and-socket joints) *and* Wizzard Wandz *and* <some
> German system
> that lets you build full-sized climbing frames from two foot long sections
> of plastic pipework - and comes with a 1/10th scale version of
> all the parts
> so you can plan your work on a more reasonable scale!>.
>
> There have been *many* others.
>
> At age 10, he is just starting in on
> pressure-treated-lumber-and-coach-bolts,
> Linux, C++ programming and my wife's 1972 VW bug!
Ummm, can you adopt older (39 yrs) kids like myself? :-)
Cheers, Ralph
|
|
 |
Subject:
|
Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Jul 2001 03:44:07 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.=nomorespam=net>
|
Reply-To:
|
sjbaker1@airmail.IHATESPAMnet
|
Viewed:
|
1531 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Simon Bennett writes:
>
> <snip>
>
> > I have now sent the letter. I didn't change it that much and it's still
> > very long but I wanted to get it out there before I got cold feet about
> > sending it at all!
>
> <snip>
>
> You rock. Very nicely done. I think I speak for a number of people when I
> say "thanks for doing this, well done!"
Yes - nicely said.
One difference that *is* significant from an educational standpoint (IMHO)
is the use of tools. Meccano really does require you to use a screwdriver
and spanner (aka wrench)...where Lego doesn't really require tools at all
(except maybe the brick separator). You might regard that as an advantage
*or* a disadvantage from an educational standpoint...I'm not sure which!
However, the way Lego eases a child gently through the 'stacking blocks'
phase through Duplo, Lego *bricks*, Technics and ultimately, Mindstorms is
unrivalled. There is no other system that can span from 1yr old to 99yrs+
with a single set of compatible components.
My kid was raised on Lego *and* Meccano *and* Lincoln Logs *and* Knex
*and* Construx *and* Girder-and-Panel *and* balsa-wood+glue *and* Anatomics
(you build dinosaur skeletons from a bunch of 'bones' that snap together
using ball-and-socket joints) *and* Wizzard Wandz *and* <some German system
that lets you build full-sized climbing frames from two foot long sections
of plastic pipework - and comes with a 1/10th scale version of all the parts
so you can plan your work on a more reasonable scale!>.
There have been *many* others.
At age 10, he is just starting in on pressure-treated-lumber-and-coach-bolts,
Linux, C++ programming and my wife's 1972 VW bug!
Lego is undoubtedly the most enduring and most flexible of those systems
- but they all have their place and to pick a *single* building system
for your kids would be to miss out on a wide range of experiences.
----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
HomeMail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com>
HomePage : http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
Projects : http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net http://tuxkart.sf.net
http://agtoys.sf.net http://prettypoly.sf.net
http://freeglut.sf.net http://toobular.sf.net
|
|
|
