Subject:
|
Re: Interesting retail pack
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:24:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2337 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Troy Cefaratti writes:
> > Would anyone from LEgo care to comment on this:
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/kkoleda/meetings/August2002/pic00015.jpg
> >
> > It has to be the oddest thing i've seen recently...
>
> Wow! That's kinda odd, but rather dubious looking if you ask me. No set
> number, no part count (could be foreign I suppose?), wacky name for a set
> (heck, why make such a set?), and to date I can't think of any sets since
> the late 70's that have had the little hook-holes and no inner baggies, but
> harder plastic casing (IE non-polybag). Also... shouldn't it have the 1x1
> black round plates? Maybe I just can't see 'em in the picture...
>
> Could the cardboard backing be from the Yoda box (or someone's scan)
> modified slightly with the text, and stuffed into the plastic casing for
> something completely un-related? If it's a bona fide set though, very wierd!
> And a great way to get extra ball-and-socket joints!
>
> DaveE
On that packaging I believe those logo choices, sizing and placements violate
in-house design rules.
a fake. but made me laugh.
nice job. only, next time, remember that SYSTEM came off SW
packaging years ago.
:-)
-Suz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
| (...) Wow! That's kinda odd, but rather dubious looking if you ask me. No set number, no part count (could be foreign I suppose?), wacky name for a set (heck, why make such a set?), and to date I can't think of any sets since the late 70's that have (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
