 | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.lego, Jake McKee wrote:
> That's right, Mike. Sorry for any confusion left by the keynote > posting
> translation.
>
> LEGO Brick Masters is targeted to and for kids.
Thanks for the clarification, Jake. I'm sad to hear it, though.
I'm one of those "sleepers" y'all were apparentlny speaking about at BrickFest
(well, perhaps I'm starting to wake up in the last couple of weeks). I'm
rediscovering LEGO and loving it.
But, I do get frustrated that the company seems (from my point of view) to be
ignoring AFOLs like me. I too took the survey on the web site, and couldn't
even answer all the questions properly, because answers applying to me as an
AFOL weren't even among the options given. So I got excited when it seemed that
LEGO was going to finally provide some support specifically for its most
dedicated, loyal, and deep-pocketed fans. But alas, it's not so. I keep
getting the impression that, ironically enough, LEGO doesn't see LEGO as a
serious adult hobby (unlike, say, the scale model train industry, or quilting
for that matter).
I have no problem with marketing toward kids -- obviously that's a big market
too. But I really wish we AFOLs could feel some love too.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hi Joe,
Stick around and you'll see that Lego does many things for AFOLs. Releasing sets
we want (Legends, trains), getting parts packs back in the sales mix, making
special events like outlet shopping at BrickFest. But when Lego produces
something it must have broad appeal and that means kids.
So I won't be taken aback at all if the Brick Master magazine has kid-oriented
instructions and comics in it.
The time for an AFOL specific magazine will come...
-Erik
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.lego, Erik Olson wrote:
> The time for an AFOL specific magazine will come...
When it's time for one to happen, and there's a dedicated and competent set of
folks to do it, it will. Meanwhile, if one wants to hasten the day, one should
be working to strengthen the community including one's local orgs so that there
are more newsworthy things to report on!
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.lego, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.lego, Erik Olson wrote:
>
> > The time for an AFOL specific magazine will come...
>
> When it's time for one to happen, and there's a dedicated and competent set of
> folks to do it, it will.
Larry, based on the setback this community already encountered with a magazine,
how far away do you think such a thing is, realistically? How much time will it
take to rebuild some of the trust that was lost? And who will it take to lead
such a venture in the future? I know that I would be hesitant to send any money
to anyone again. But at the same time I think the time for such a project could
be today, tomorrow, next week. I'm not sure it needs to wait any longer.
I wonder... what if, the magazine were more of a 'newsletter' and rather than
focus on subscriptions and glossy presentation the person(s) creating it focused
on content and participation? I just wonder, I don't have any answers.
Best regards,
Allan B.
| | | | | | |
