| |
In lugnet.general, Nathan Wells wrote:
Hey, just a little side note about the two reviews noting the title “Lord of the
LEGO” It is a rather presumptuous title. Are you really the Lord of the LEGO?
I can’t decide if its more or less presumptuous than “LEGOMASTER”
~Kevin
Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Pope
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
| |
Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Pope
|
Hey, who died and made you Pope?
++Lar (who has been known to hang with watery tarts, hoping for the best)
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
| |
Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Pope
|
Hey, who died and made you Pope?
++Lar (who has been known to hang with watery tarts, hoping for the best)
|
When the Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Council of Bishops were deciding
who to make the next Supreme Intergalactic UItimate LEGO Pope, the choice was
obvious.
There was only one person Supreme enough.
There was only one person Intergalactic enough.
There was only one person Ultimate enough.
There was only one person LEGO enough.
There was only one person Pope enough.
And it was me.
~Kevin
Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Pope
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Nathan Wells wrote:
snip
> Hey, just a little side note about the two reviews noting the title "Lord of
> the LEGO" It is a rather presumptuous title. Are you really the Lord of
> the LEGO?
>
> I can't decide if its more or less presumptuous than "LEGOMASTER"
I though we cleared that up. Why are you bagging on my old nic-name?
People gave it to me. Your always gonna have this animosity towards me.
Too bad really. Why can't you just let people be who they are. Your so
judgmental. How about for starters you reply back to my kind email asking why
you had to exemplify my Little Bot in your contest? Or try attacking me
directly. Or try this, ever give much thought to just saying hello to me?
F.O, KMA, U LS.
> `~Kevin ¬
> Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Pope
e
BTW, this is not the first time, you have given Nathan a hard time either.
Congrats, you just made a troll post.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
| |
Hey, just a little side note about the two reviews noting the title “Lord of
the LEGO” It is a rather presumptuous title. Are you really the Lord of
the LEGO?
I can’t decide if its more or less presumptuous than “LEGOMASTER”
~Kevin
Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Pope
|
Hmm..odd how you don’t criticize my screenname at Classic-Castle.com, but you
bash me everytime I post on LUGNET.
My sceenname is a spoof of the Lord of the Rings - One Brick To Rule Them All,
One Ring To Rule Them All, get it? I’m not trying to be presumptuous.
This is another reason I don’t post to LUGNET much anymore, all this bashing
over screennames and such. At CC.com, members don’t give a damn if one’s name
is LORD-GOD-KING OF ALL MANKIND or something like that, we chat about LEGO and
have fun.
Anyway, sorry about hijacking this thread.
returns to lurking...
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Eric Sophie wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Nathan Wells wrote:
>
> snip
>
> > Hey, just a little side note about the two reviews noting the title "Lord of
> > the LEGO" It is a rather presumptuous title. Are you really the Lord of
> > the LEGO?
> >
> > I can't decide if its more or less presumptuous than "LEGOMASTER"
>
> I though we cleared that up. Why are you bagging on my old nic-name?
> People gave it to me. Your always gonna have this animosity towards me.
> Too bad really. Why can't you just let people be who they are. Your so
> judgmental. How about for starters you reply back to my kind email asking why
> you had to exemplify my Little Bot in your contest? Or try attacking me
> directly. Or try this, ever give much thought to just saying hello to me?
>
> F.O, KMA, U LS.
Wow, I guess I should have added a " ;) " to the end of my post, as I originally
had it. It's just a light hearted poke, no real harm meant...
I have no problem with your friends calling you the LEGOMASTER, it is quite an
appropriate nick. It simply seems odd that the same nick would carry into a
world populated exclusively by people who share an interest in LEGO.
Anyway, I am sorry that you didn't see that I was joking, its almost sad.
Re: the email ... I wasn't aware you invented the word "bot", sorry for using it
without written consent.
Also, out of curiousity, what does "F.O, KMA, U LS" mean? The only things that
I can come up with are wildly inapporpriate for Lugnet.
> BTW, this is not the first time, you have given Nathan a hard time either.
> Congrats, you just made a troll post.
I consider Nathan a friend, we talk online regularly.
(Anyway) you rock.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Nathan Wells wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
| |
Hey, just a little side note about the two reviews noting the title “Lord of
the LEGO” It is a rather presumptuous title. Are you really the Lord of
the LEGO?
I can’t decide if its more or less presumptuous than “LEGOMASTER”
~Kevin
Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Pope
|
Hmm..odd how you don’t criticize my screenname at Classic-Castle.com, but you
bash me everytime I post on LUGNET.
My sceenname is a spoof of the Lord of the Rings - One Brick To Rule Them
All, One Ring To Rule Them All, get it? I’m not trying to be presumptuous.
This is another reason I don’t post to LUGNET much anymore, all this bashing
over screennames and such. At CC.com, members don’t give a damn if one’s
name is LORD-GOD-KING OF ALL MANKIND or something like that, we chat about
LEGO and have fun.
Anyway, sorry about hijacking this thread.
returns to lurking...
|
It’s also odd that I can’t joke around with my friends.
Nathan, I consider you a friend, we talk online regularly. We work together at
CC, remember?
I am beginning to feel that humour and free speech aren’t welcome here at Lugnet
anymore.
It seems Larry even got my humour, based on his reply, and no offense to him, he
doesn’t always get jokes ;)
~Just Plain Ole Kevin Again
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Eric Sophie wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
> > > In lugnet.general, Nathan Wells wrote:
> >
> > snip
> >
> > > Hey, just a little side note about the two reviews noting the title "Lord of
> > > the LEGO" It is a rather presumptuous title. Are you really the Lord of
> > > the LEGO?
> > >
> > > I can't decide if its more or less presumptuous than "LEGOMASTER"
> >
> > I though we cleared that up. Why are you bagging on my old nic-name?
> > People gave it to me. Your always gonna have this animosity towards me.
> > Too bad really. Why can't you just let people be who they are. Your so
> > judgmental. How about for starters you reply back to my kind email asking why
> > you had to exemplify my Little Bot in your contest? Or try attacking me
> > directly. Or try this, ever give much thought to just saying hello to me?
> >
> > F.O, KMA, U LS.
>
>
> Wow, I guess I should have added a " ;) " to the end of my post, as I originally
> had it. It's just a light hearted poke, no real harm meant...
BS, you already bothered more than two people with your rude comments. Layoff
already. Quit your back peddling. You called me out now deal with it. Be a Man.
> I have no problem with your friends calling you the LEGOMASTER, it is quite an
> appropriate nick. It simply seems odd that the same nick would carry into a
> world populated exclusively by people who share an interest in LEGO.
Ya, thus your light hearted comments? You have some other stick in your craw.
> Anyway, I am sorry that you didn't see that I was joking, its almost sad.
Sad? I continue to detect an attitude. You call me out by name and I'm on your
ass. I stick up for myself. I have not come this far to take comments like yours
lightly anymore. Got something to say then discuss it. Your cheap shots are not
why I come here. Thanks alot.
If you did your home work, you'll see "I" left the nic name behind years ago.
When I first started to develope a public relationship with the Lego Company.
I have been and will always be from then on....Eric Sophie.
You and others can't look past that. The only current reference I have is on the
.mecha page. At least there I know I'm respected and people get the gag.
You made these exact comments before too both of us. Would you like me to dig up
the links.
> Re: the email ... I wasn't aware you invented the word "bot", sorry for using it
> without written consent.
Too bad you and your partner didn't have the balls to reply back.
Your cowarding until now demonstrates your lack of respect.
Additionally, you know as well as I that I am not implying ownership.
Again another cheap shot.
To the contrary, you are the ones trying to say what a bot is and what is not.
Who the heck gives a hoot. Lay off this BS.
> Also, out of curiousity, what does "F.O, KMA, U LS" mean? The only things that
> I can come up with are wildly inapporpriate for Lugnet.
Tell you what. I find out you or any one of the lot of malcontents that
circulates around here talks smack again you'll find out what it means.
> > BTW, this is not the first time, you have given Nathan a hard time either.
> > Congrats, you just made a troll post.
>
> I consider Nathan a friend, we talk online regularly.
Where I come from you act like that and expect to get punked.
> (Anyway) you rock.
Save it for a MOC.
e
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Eric Sophie wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
> [snip a lot]
Let's all just get along. Kev's here to have a good time; it's all in fun.
Don't you ever break your friends' balls?
--Bram
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Bram Lambrecht wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Eric Sophie wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
> > [snip a lot]
>
> Let's all just get along. Kev's here to have a good time; it's all in fun.
> Don't you ever break your friends' balls?
> --Bram
k, I'll play. Though I might point out that any ball busting comes through a
mutual repsect and a trust when taking liberties with people's feelings.
We have to earn that first.
I rather we all get along too. I'll offer a shake. Make no mistake, from the
things I found out recently, there may be more confrontations comming in the
place and time of my choosing.
The days of back room smack talk should be over.
e
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
| |
It’s also odd that I can’t joke around with my friends.
Nathan, I consider you a friend, we talk online regularly. We work together
at CC, remember?
|
Hey, sorry man, sometimes I just don’t get a joke unless someone has to put a
:-) at the end of the post (I can be pretty thick at times :D)
| |
I am beginning to feel that humour and free speech aren’t welcome here at
Lugnet anymore.
|
Same here...Either I don’t get joke, or no one gets mine...
I’m glad we’ve cleared all this up!
Now back to building!
;)
|
|
|
