Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Dec 2000 16:48:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10100 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Eric Joslin writes:
> I disagree that if someone simply feels they can build one of your
> sets without buying it from you, and does so for their own enjoyment,
> there's any reason for you to get upset.
I can get upset if I want. I can be flattered if I want. I can be both at
the same time if I want. I can do so for any reason or no reason at all if I
want.
What I won't do (and what James won't do) is *do* anything about it, other
than perhaps present an economic analysis of why it may or may not be cost
effective (but then, when is anything we do about our hobby actually
rational from a purely economic point of view unless you assign a monetary
value to happiness) to copy our work in some cases.
I reiterate, I don't see any disagreement here. Everyone agrees on what's
reasonable and what isn't.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
|
| (...) This is where you're making your mistake: We aren't talking about someone selling sets that resemble GoB sets. We *are* talking about someone building the set FOR THEIR OWN USE without buying it. I agree completely that if someone copied one (...) (23 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
|
231 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
