 | | Re: Brickfest 2000 Pirate Game Postmortem —Richard Parsons
|
| | | "Frank Filz" wrote (...) <<hoping this is not a stupid question but>> How come the emphasis on the cutters, and not the big ships? Richard Still baldly going... (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickfest 2000 Pirate Game Postmortem —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) You start out the game with a cutter... you're supposed to move on to bigger ships later, but most of us didn't get that far in the game. -Shiri (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brickfest 2000 Pirate Game Postmortem —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Correct. We were playing something more akin to the campaign game where you start with a cutter and move up. In addition to the potential for interesting play, this also had the advantage of giving the players a less complicated ship to deal (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickfest 2000 Pirate Game Postmortem —Sean Forbes
|
| | | | | | (...) Well put. The first campaign I played allowed for a Class 1 with a cannon or a Class 2 without (this was Evil Stevie's fleet so there were no shortages) I took a Class 2 with extra crew and intimidated a few fishermen into 'donating' thier (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickfest 2000 Pirate Game Postmortem —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | (...) ...I think cutters worked well enuf for our general level of cluelessness :-) Tho perhaps it would have been nicer with size 2 ships so we could at least have a spare gun about :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | | |
