 | | Re: lego factions and series —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) Everyone pretty much decides what side they want to be good or bad. (...) Opportunistic. (...) Good. (...) Obscure balance of Knightly and Greedy. (...) Amoral. (...) Well, there's good, there's bad, and then there's ugly. (...) I dunno, I (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: lego factions and series —Andrew Weiner
|
| | | | | (...) totally agree i change my guys affiliations sometimes but not much but the ones i gave in this were what i think lego wanted them to be (...) the crusaders are good (...) well the fright knights had crumby sets, they go high on ebay though, (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: lego factions and series —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | (...) Good... Bad... I'm the guy with the crown. Heh. There's an Evil Dead game coming out for the Dreamcast with voice supplied by Bruce himself. Can't wait. obCastle: The original name for Army of Darkness was "Mid-Evil Dead", but the studio nixed (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: lego factions and series —Tony A. Rowe
|
| | | | (...) Well, I always figured if I were a minifig, I'd be part of the Black Falcons. As a Card-Carrying Oppressed Libertarian, I guess I will have to change my minifig allegiance! I always saw the Forestmen as liberals myself, steal from the rich and (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
