 | | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ? —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | Hello! (...) I do not agree at all :-) (...) In these years there were no "Good" and "Bad", there were just knights from different clans, who sometimes made war on each other, sometimes lived in peace together. BTW the Crusaders are more aggressive (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ? —Yaron Dori
|
| | | | Hi again (...) You can look at it that way too I guess (...) Don't agree. I mean it's true that Crusaders had more battle machines, but they more in everything. Black Falcons had only 6 LEGO sets while the Crusaders had like 14. They had more in (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ? —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | Hello! [Crusaders vs. Black Falcons] (...) That's true. And this is why I always preferred Black Falcons rather than Crusaders. BFs were the underdogs that I've sympathy for. (...) Hehe, I can understand this point of view. Crusaders look noble with (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
